Abstract:The capacity to collect and analyse data is growing exponentially. Referred to as ‘Big Data’, this scientific, social and technological trend has helped create destabilising amounts of information, which can challenge accepted social and ethical norms. Big Data remains a fuzzy idea, emerging across social, scientific, and business contexts sometimes seemingly related only by the gigantic size of the datasets being considered. As is often the case with the cutting edge of scientific and technological progress, understanding of the ethical implications of Big Data lags behind. In order to bridge such a gap, this article systematically and comprehensively analyses academic literature concerning the ethical implications of Big Data, providing a watershed for future ethical investigations and regulations. Particular attention is paid to biomedical Big Data due to the inherent sensitivity of medical information. By means of a meta-analysis of the literature, a thematic narrative is provided to guide ethicists, data scientists, regulators and other stakeholders through what is already known or hypothesised about the ethical risks of this emerging and innovative phenomenon. Five key areas of concern are identified: (1) informed consent, (2) privacy (including anonymisation and data protection), (3) ownership, (4) epistemology and objectivity, and (5) ‘Big Data Divides’ created between those who have or lack the necessary resources to analyse increasingly large datasets. Critical gaps in the treatment of these themes are identified with suggestions for future research. Six additional areas of concern are then suggested which, although related have not yet attracted extensive debate in the existing literature. It is argued that they will require much closer scrutiny in the immediate future: (6) the dangers of ignoring group-level ethical harms; (7) the importance of epistemology in assessing the ethics of Big Data; (8) the changing nature of fiduciary relationships that become increasingly data saturated; (9) the need to distinguish between ‘academic’ and ‘commercial’ Big Data practices in terms of potential harm to data subjects; (10) future problems with ownership of intellectual property generated from analysis of aggregated datasets; and (11) the difficulty of providing meaningful access rights to individual data subjects that lack necessary resources. Considered together, these eleven themes provide a thorough critical framework to guide ethical assessment and governance of emerging Big Data practices.

Addressing Conceptual Gaps in Big Data Research Ethics: An Application of Contextual Integrity

Ethical Issues in Social Science Research Employing Big Data

The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts

A contextual integrity approach to genomic information: what bioethics can learn from big data ethics

Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?

Ethical considerations surrounding health-related big data research

The Issue of “Context”: Data, Culture, and Commercial Context in Social Media Ethics

Big data ethics, machine ethics or information ethics? Navigating the maze of applied ethics in IT

Contextual Consent: Ethical Mining of Social Media for Health Research

Qualitative research at the crossroads of open science and big data: Ethical considerations

Ethical Responsibilities for Companies That Process Personal Data

Contextual Exceptionalism After Death: An Information Ethics Approach to Post-Mortem Privacy in Health Data Research

Online Public Health Intelligence: Ethical Considerations at the Big Data Era

Privacy in the age of medical big data

The Ethics of Biomedical Big Data

A Human-Centered Approach to Data Privacy : Political Economy, Power, and Collective Data Subjects

Embedding Privacy in Computational Social Science and Artificial Intelligence Research

Ethical and Privacy Considerations with Location Based Data Research

Big data privacy: The datafication of personal information

Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research

Privacy, ethics, and data access: A case study of the Fragile Families Challenge