Expressed Emotion, Shame, and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury

Jessica Hack,Graham Martin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050890
IF: 4.614
2018-04-30
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:A cross-sectional study examining relationships between perceived family Expressed Emotion and shame, emotional involvement, depression, anxiety, stress and non-suicidal self-injury, in 264 community and online adults (21.6% male). We compared self-injurers with non-self-injurers, and current with past self-injurers. Self-injurers experienced more family Expressed Emotion (EE) than non-injurers (<i>t</i>(254) = &amp;minus;3.24, <i>p</i> = 0.001), linear contrasts explaining 6% of between-groups variability (<i>F</i>(2, 254) = 7.36, <i>p</i> = 0.001, &amp;eta;² = 0.06). Differences in EE between current and past self-injurers were not significant. Overall shame accounted for 33% of between-groups variance (<i>F</i>(2, 252) = 61.99, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, &amp;eta;² = 0.33), with linear contrasts indicating self-injurers experienced higher levels compared to non-injurers (<i>t</i>(252) = &amp;minus;8.23, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Current self-injurers reported higher overall shame than past self-injurers (<i>t</i>(252) = 6.78, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In further logistic regression, emotional involvement and overall shame were the only significant predictors of self-injury status. With every one-unit increase in emotional involvement, odds of currently engaging in self-injury decreased by a factor of 0.860. Conversely, a one-unit increase in overall shame was associated with an increase in the odds of being a current self-injurer by a factor of 1.05. The findings have important treatment implications for engaging key family members in intervention and prevention efforts.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?