Traumatic knee injury: correlation of radiographic effusion size with the presence of internal derangement on magnetic resonance imaging

Nathan D. Cecava,Shane Dieckman,Kevin P. Banks,Liem T. Mansfield
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1605-z
2018-05-08
Emergency Radiology
Abstract:PurposeTraumatic knee injury is a common clinical presentation. However, knee internal derangement often goes undiagnosed on physical exam. The authors hypothesize that patients with suprapatellar joint effusion greater than 10 mm anteroposterior diameter on lateral radiograph have a high likelihood of knee internal derangement on magnetic resonance imaging.Materials and methodsA retrospective review of knee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging in 198 patients age 18–40 years with acute knee injury was performed. Suprapatellar effusion diameter on lateral radiography was correlated to the presence of internal derangement on magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging anteroposterior effusion size at four locations was correlated to radiographic suprapatellar effusion measurements.ResultsLogistic regression showed a positive correlation between radiographic effusion size and the presence of internal derangement on magnetic resonance exams (p value < 0.001). Radiographic effusion > 10 mm was established as a positive test, yielding test sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 55, 96, 93, 71, and 77%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed the radiographic anteroposterior effusion diameter most closely approximated the magnetic resonance effusion diameter at the lateral patellofemoral recess.ConclusionsThis study shows that knee radiography is a highly specific screening test for internal derangement in patients less than 40 years old with acute knee injury. In this patient population, knee effusion > 10 mm on lateral radiograph should prompt consideration for knee magnetic resonance examination. Adopting this approach as a clinical guideline has the potential to decrease delayed diagnosis, improve patient outcomes, and decrease cost-associated disability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?