Abstract:The bacterial chaperonin GroEL and the co-chaperonin GroES assist in the folding of a number of structurally unrelated substrate proteins (SPs). In the absence of chaperonins, SP folds by the kinetic partitioning mechanism (KPM), according to which a fraction of unfolded molecules reaches the native state directly, while the remaining fraction gets trapped in a potentially aggregation-prone misfolded state. During the catalytic reaction cycle, GroEL undergoes a series of allosteric transitions (T<-->R-->R"-->T) triggered by SP capture, ATP binding and hydrolysis, and GroES binding. We developed a general kinetic model that takes into account the coupling between the rates of the allosteric transitions and the folding and aggregation of the SP. Our model, in which the GroEL allosteric rates and SP-dependent folding and aggregation rates are independently varied without prior assumption, quantitatively fits the GroEL concentration-dependent data on the yield of native ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) as a function of time. The extracted kinetic parameters for the GroEL reaction cycle are consistent with the available values from independent experiments. In addition, we also obtained physically reasonable parameters for the kinetic steps in the reaction cycle that are difficult to measure. If experimental values for GroEL allosteric rates are used, the time-dependent changes in native-state yield at eight GroEL concentrations can be quantitatively fit using only three SP-dependent parameters. The model predicts that the differences in the efficiencies (as measured by yields of the native state) of GroEL, single-ring mutant (SR1), and variants of SR1, in the rescue of mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, and Rubisco, are related to the large variations in the allosteric transition rates. We also show that GroEL/S mutants that efficiently fold one SP at the expense of all others are due to a decrease in the rate of a key step in the reaction cycle, which implies that wild-type GroEL has evolved as a compromise between generality and specificity. We predict that, under maximum loading conditions and saturating ATP concentration, the efficiency of GroEL (using parameters for Rubisco) depends predominantly on the rate of R-->R" transition, while the equilibrium constant of the T<-->R has a small effect only. Both under sub- and superstoichiometric GroEL concentrations, enhanced efficiency is achieved by rapid turnover of the reaction cycle, which is in accord with the predictions of the iterative annealing mechanism. The effects are most dramatic at substoichiometric conditions (most relevant for in vivo situations) when SP aggregation can outcompete capture of SP by chaperonins.

Substrate protein dependence of GroEL–GroES interaction cycle revealed by high-speed atomic force microscopy imaging

GroEL Mediates Protein Folding with a Two Successive Timer Mechanism

GroEL/GroES: Structure and Function of a Two-Stroke Folding Machine

Visualizing chaperonin function in situ by cryo-electron tomography

Crystal Structure Of A Groel-Adp Complex In The Relaxed Allosteric State At 2.7 Angstrom Resolution

Chaperonin GroEL uses asymmetric and symmetric reaction cycles in response to the concentration of non-native substrate proteins

Kinetic model for the coupling between allosteric transitions in GroEL and substrate protein folding and aggregation

Dynamics of allosteric transitions in GroEL

GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding

The reaction cycle of GroEL and GroES in chaperonin-assisted protein folding

The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex

Protein folding: How the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics

Multivalent Binding of Nonnative Substrate Proteins by the Chaperonin GroEL

GroEL Ring Separation and Exchange in the Chaperonin Reaction

From Minichaperone to GroEL 3: Properties of an Active Single-ring Mutant of GroEL

Reaction Cycle of Chaperonin GroEL via Symmetric “Football” Intermediate

Symmetric GroEL:GroES <sub>2</sub> complexes are the protein-folding functional form of the chaperonin nanomachine

Chaperonin GroEL Reassembly: An Effect of Protein Ligands and Solvent Composition

Monitoring Protein Conformation along the Pathway of Chaperonin-Assisted Folding

GroEL/GroES cycling: ATP binds to an open ring before substrate protein favoring protein binding and production of the native state

Symmetric GroEL:GroES2 complexes are the protein-folding functional form of the chaperonin nanomachine.