Abstract:In 2012 a regional risk assessment was published that applied Bayesian networks to the structure of the relative risk model. The original structure of the relative risk model (RRM) was published in the late 1990s and developed during the next decade. The RRM coupled with a Monte Carlo analysis was applied to calculating risk to a number of sites and a variety of questions. The sites included watersheds, terrestrial systems, and marine environments and included stressors such as nonindigenous species, effluents, pesticides, nutrients, and management options. However, it became apparent that there were limits to the original approach. In 2009, the relative risk model was transitioned into the structure of a Bayesian network (BN). Bayesian networks had several clear advantages. First, BNs innately incorporated categories and as in the case of the relative risk model, ranks to describe systems. Second, interactions between multiple stressors can be combined using several pathways and the conditional probability tables (CPT) to calculate outcomes. Entropy analysis was the method used to document model sensitivity. As with the RRM, the method has now been applied to a wide series of sites and questions, from forestry management, to invasive species, to disease, the interaction of ecological and human health endpoints, the flows of large rivers, and now the efficacy and risks of synthetic biology. The application of both methods have pointed to the incompleteness of the fields of environmental chemistry, toxicology and risk assessment. The low frequency of exposure‐response experiments and proper analysis have limited the available outputs for building appropriate CPTs. Interactions between multiple chemicals, landscape characteristics, population dynamics and community structure have been poorly characterized even for critical environments. A better strategy might have been to first look at the requirements of modern risk assessment approaches and then set research priorities.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Improved Bayesian Network-Based Risk Model and Its Application in Disaster Risk Assessment

Marine disaster risk assessment based on weighted Bayesian Network

Expert Knowledge-Driven Bayesian Network Modeling for Marine Disaster Assessment Under the Small Sample Condition

A Data-Driven Bayesian Network Model Integrating Physical Knowledge for Prioritization of Risk Influencing Factors

Marine Disaster Assessment and Management Based on Weighted Bayesian Network

A New Marine Disaster Assessment Model Combining Bayesian Network with Information Diffusion

Bayesian Network Model for Fast Disaster Assessment in Unconventional Emergencies Management

Bayesian network with quantitative input for maritime risk analysis

Assessment of Debris Flow Hazards Using A Bayesian Network

Information Security Risk Assessment Based on Improved Bayesian Network Model

A quantitative risk analysis model considering uncertain information

Assessment of Liquefaction-Induced Hazards Using Bayesian Networks Based on Standard Penetration Test Data

A Combined Method to Build Bayesian Network for Fire Risk Assessment of Historical Buildings

Modeling the Dynamics of Community Resilience to Coastal Hazards Using a Bayesian Network

The ModeIing Method with Bayesian Networks and Its AppIication in the Threat Assess ment Under S maII Data Sets

The Origin, Development, Application, Lessons Learned, and Future Regarding the Bayesian Network Relative Risk Model for Ecological Risk Assessment

Development of An Improved Bayesian Network Method for Maritime Accident Safety Assessment Based on Multiscale Scenario Analysis Theory

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for China Based on Bayesian Network

A Bayesian Network Model for Seismic Risk Analysis.

Improved Bayesian Network and Its Application in Autonomous Capability Evaluation

Flood risk assessment by using an interpretative structural modeling based Bayesian network approach (ISM-BN): An urban-level analysis of Shenzhen, China.