Abstract:Abstract In digital image reproduction, it is often desirable to compute image difference of reproductions and the original images. The traditional CIE color difference formula, designed for simple color patches in controlled viewing conditions, is not adequate for computing image difference for spatially complex image stimuli. Zhang and Wandell [Proceedings of the SID Symposium, 1996; p 731–734] introduced the S‐CIELAB model to account for complex color stimuli using spatial filtering as a preprocessing stage. Building on S‐CIELAB, iCAM was designed to serve as both a color appearance model and also an image difference metric for complex color stimuli [IS&T/SID 10th Color Imaging Conference, 2002; p 33–38]. These image difference models follow a similar image processing path to approximate the behavior of human observers. Generally, image pairs are first converted into device‐independent coordinates such as CIE XYZ tristimulus values or approximate human cone responses (LMS), and then further transformed into opponent‐color channels approximating white‐black, red‐green, and yellow‐blue color perceptions. Once in the opponent space, the images are filtered with approximations of human contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) to remove information that is invisible to the human visual system. The images are then transformed back to a color difference space such as CIELAB, and pixel‐by‐pixel color differences are calculated. The shape and effectiveness of the CSF spatial filters used in this type of modeling is highly dependent on the choice of opponent color space. For image difference calculations, the ideal opponent color space would be both linear and orthogonal such that the linear filtering is correct and any spatial processing on one channel does not affect the others. This article presents a review of historical opponent color spaces and an experimental derivation of a new color space and corresponding spatial filters specifically designed for image color difference calculations. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 2010

Color correction matrix for sparse RGB-W image sensor without IR cutoff filter

Colorimetric Characterization of Scanner by Measures of Perceptual Color Error.

Compressive Single-Pixel Hyperspectral Imaging Using RGB Sensors

Estimation of Optoelectronic Conversion Functions of Imaging Devices Without Using Gray Samples

A Learnable Color Correction Matrix for RAW Reconstruction

Color‐Accurate Camera Capture with Multispectral Illumination and Multiple Exposures

65 nm CMOS Sensors Applied to Mathematically Exact Colorimetric Reconstruction

Different Matrices for CIECAM02

Recovering fluorescent spectra with an RGB digital camera and color filters using different matrix factorizations

A Sample-Based Color Correction Method for Laparoscopic Images.

Derivation of a color space for image color difference measurement

Lighting Deviation Correction for Integrating-Sphere Multispectral Imaging Systems.

Multispectral color image capture using a liquid crystal tunable filter

Spectral Sensitivity Estimation Without a Camera

Inter-Camera Color Correction for Multispectral Imaging with Camera Arrays Using a Consensus Image

The Method Of Color Restoration Based On Cymg Complementary Colors Cfa Pattern

A Single Sensor Based Multispectral Imaging Camera using a Narrow Spectral Band Colour Mosaic Integrated on the Monochrome CMOS Image Sensor

A Revised Formulation Based on CIECAM16 for Cross-media Colour Reproduction Via Real Scene Experiment

Beyond White: Ground Truth Colors for Color Constancy Correction

Colorization-Based RGB-White Color Interpolation using Color Filter Array with Randomly Sampled Pattern

Designing Color Filters that Make Cameras MoreColorimetric