Contrast medium induced acute kidney injury: a narrative review

Valentina Pistolesi,Giuseppe Regolisti,Santo Morabito,Ilaria Gandolfini,Silvia Corrado,Giovanni Piotti,Enrico Fiaccadori
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-018-0498-y
IF: 4.4061
2018-05-25
Journal of Nephrology
Abstract:Background and aimsContrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is the third leading cause of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury. It is more commonly observed following intra-arterial administration of iodinated contrast media (CM) for cardiac procedures in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD), and is associated with increased short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. This review investigates the key current evidence on CI-AKI definition, epidemiology and pathogenesis, as a basis for recommending preventive measures that can be implemented in clinical practice.MethodsAn extensive literature search was performed to identify the relevant studies describing the epidemiology, pathogenesis, outcome and prevention of CI-AKI.Results and conclusionPre-existing CKD, intra-arterial administration and CM volume are the most important risk factors for CI-AKI. Since risk factors for CI-AKI are well defined, and the timing of renal insult is known, patients should be carefully stratified before the administration of CM, in order to reduce the negative impact of modifiable risk factors on renal function. The intravenous administration of moderate amounts of isotonic saline solution or bicarbonate solution still represents the principal intervention with documented and acceptable effectiveness for CI-AKI prevention. More data are needed on aggressive volume expansion strategies along with diuretics, targeting forced diuresis with high urinary output. The role of antioxidant agents remains controversial, and only moderate evidence exists in favour of N-acetylcysteine. Statins could contribute to reducing the incidence of CI-AKI, although their mechanism of action is not fully ascertained. No robust data demonstrate a reduction of CI-AKI incidence by peri-procedural hemodialysis/hemofiltration; renal replacement therapies may carry instead unnecessary risks. Remote ischemic preconditioning might represent a simple, non-invasive and cost effective preventive measure for CI-AKI prevention, but few data are currently available about its clinical application in patients at high risk of CI-AKI.
urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?