To Nap or Not to Nap? A Systematic Review Evaluating Napping Behavior in Athletes and the Impact on Various Measures of Athletic Performance
Michele Lastella,Shona L Halson,Jacopo A Vitale,Aamir R Memon,Grace E Vincent
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S315556
2021-06-24
Nature and Science of Sleep
Abstract:Michele Lastella, 1 Shona L Halson, 2 Jacopo A Vitale, 3 Aamir R Memon, 4 Grace E Vincent 1 1 Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, Adelaide, Australia; 2 School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia; 3 Laboratory of Movement and Sport Science, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy; 4 Institute of Physiotherapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, Peoples University of Medical & Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Shaheed Benazirabad, Pakistan Correspondence: Michele Lastella Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, Central Queensland University, Adelaide, Australia Tel +61 413407956 Email Purpose: The objective of this systematic review was to 1) determine how studies evaluated napping behavior in athletes (frequency, duration, timing and measurement); 2) explore how napping impacted physical performance, cognitive performance, perceptual measures (eg, fatigue, muscle soreness, sleepiness and alertness), psychological state and night-time sleep in athletes. Methods: Five bibliographic databases were searched from database inception to 11 August 2020. Observational and experimental studies comprising able-bodied athletes (mean age ≥ 12 years), published in English, in peer-reviewed journal papers were included. The Downs and Black Quality Assessment Checklist was used for quality appraisal. Results: Thirty-seven studies were identified of moderate quality. Most studies did not include consistent information regarding nap frequency, duration, and timing. Napping may be beneficial for a range of outcomes that benefit athletes (eg, physical and cognitive performance, perceptual measures, psychological state and night-time sleep). In addition, napping presents athletes with the opportunity to supplement their night-time sleep without compromising sleep quality. Conclusion: Athletes may consider napping between 20 to 90 min in duration and between 13:00 and 16:00 hours. Finally, athletes should allow 30 min to reduce sleep inertia prior to training or competition to obtain better performance outcomes. Future studies should include comprehensive recordings of nap duration and quality, and consider using sleep over a 24 hour period (daytime naps and night-time sleep period), specifically using objective methods of sleep assessment (eg, polysomnography/actigraphy). Keywords: athlete, health behavior, performance, physical health, psychological health, sleep, sports Napping is a ubiquitous behavior and an important public health tool to offset the adverse short- and long-term impacts of inadequate sleep. 1 By definition, a nap is any sleep period with a duration of less than 50% of the average major sleep period of an individual. 2 A nap is often referred to as a 'short sleep' which is distinct from, and considerably shorter than an individual's normal sleep episode. 2 , 3 Naps may be further categorized into three main types: a) the prophylactic nap: a nap taken in anticipation of sleep loss; b) the replacement nap: a nap taken in response to sleep loss; and c) the appetitive nap: a nap taken for convenience and/or enjoyment. 4 Another consideration absent within the sleep literature is the idea that athletes take naps as they are educated that napping may result in recovery and performance benefits. Napping during the day can increase the amount of sleep obtained in a 24-hour period and many athletes report including daytime napping in their training program. 5 , 6 For example, Sargent et al 6 demonstrated that more naps were taken on training days compared to rest days, and strategic napping during the day, as well as sleep hygiene practices (ie, healthy sleep practices) at night need to be considered. While several studies have investigated the impact of restricting or extending sleep on a number of outcomes of athletic performance (eg, sprint times, reaction time), 7 there has been comparatively less focus on the impact of napping. 8 , 9 It is possible that the lack of dedicated napping research in athletes may limit the ability of athletes, coaches and sports professionals to effectively implement strategic napping within their training programs. Athletes are exposed to many stressors that impair sleep, including high training loads, competition demands, early morning training, travel and altitude exposu -Abstract Truncated-
neurosciences,clinical neurology