Oral galactagogues (natural therapies or drugs) for increasing breast milk production in mothers of non-hospitalised term infants.
Siew Cheng Foong,May Loong Tan,Wai Cheng Foong,Lisa A Marasco,Jacqueline J Ho,Joo Howe Ong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011505.pub2
IF: 8.4
2020-05-20
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Abstract:Many women express concern about their ability to produce enough milk, and insufficient milk is frequently cited as the reason for supplementation and early termination of breastfeeding. When addressing this concern, it is important first to consider the influence of maternal and neonatal health, infant suck, proper latch, and feeding frequency on milk production, and that steps be taken to correct or compensate for any contributing issues. Oral galactagogues are substances that stimulate milk production. They may be pharmacological or non‐pharmacological (natural). Natural galactagogues are usually botanical or other food agents. The choice between pharmacological or natural galactagogues is often influenced by familiarity and local customs. Evidence for the possible benefits and harms of galactagogues is important for making an informed decision on their use. To assess the effect of oral galactagogues for increasing milk production in non‐hospitalised breastfeeding mother‐term infant pairs. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov , the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ( ICTRP ), Health Research and Development Network ‐ Phillippines ( HERDIN ), Natural Products Alert ( Napralert ), the personal reference collection of author LM, and reference lists of retrieved studies (4 November 2019). We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi‐RCTs (including published abstracts) comparing oral galactagogues with placebo, no treatment, or another oral galactagogue in mothers breastfeeding healthy term infants. We also included cluster‐randomised trials but excluded cross‐over trials. We used standard Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth methods for data collection and analysis. Two to four review authors independently selected the studies, assessed the risk of bias, extracted data for analysis and checked accuracy. Where necessary, we contacted the study authors for clarification. Forty‐one RCTs involving 3005 mothers and 3006 infants from at least 17 countries met the inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted either in hospitals immediately postpartum or in the community. There was considerable variation in mothers, particularly in parity and whether or not they had lactation insufficiency. Infants' ages at commencement of the studies ranged from newborn to 6 months. The overall certainty of evidence was low to very low because of high risk of biases (mainly due to lack of blinding), substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity, and imprecision of measurements. Pharmacological galactagogues Nine studies compared a pharmacological galactagogue (domperidone, metoclopramide, sulpiride, thyrotropin‐releasing hormone) with placebo or no treatment. The primary outcome of proportion of mothers who continued breastfeeding at 3, 4 and 6 months was not reported. Only one study (metoclopramide) reported on the outcome of infant weight, finding little or no difference (mean difference (MD) 23.0 grams, 95% confidence interval (CI) ‐47.71 to 93.71; 1 study, 20 participants; low‐certainty evidence). Three studies (metoclopramide, domperidone, sulpiride) reported on milk volume, finding pharmacological galactagogues may increase milk volume (MD 63.82 mL, 95% CI 25.91 to 101.72; I2 = 34%; 3 studies, 151 participants; low‐certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis indicates there may be increased milk volume with each drug, but with varying CIs. There was limited reporting of adverse effects, none of which could be meta‐analysed. Where reported, they were limited to minor complaints, such as tiredness, nausea, headache and dry mouth (very low‐certainty evidence). No adverse effects were reported for infants. Natural galactagogues Twenty‐seven studies compared natural oral galactagogues (banana flower, fennel, fenugreek, ginger, ixbut, levant cotton, moringa, palm dates, pork knuckle, shatavari, silymarin, torbangun leaves or other natural mixtures) with placebo or no treatment. One study (Mother's Milk Tea) reported breastfeeding rates at six months with a concluding statement of "no significant difference" (no data and no measure of significance provided, 60 participants, very low‐certainty evidence). Three studies (fennel, fenugreek, moringa, mixed botanical tea) reported infant weight but could not be meta‐analysed due to substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity (I 2 = 60%, 275 participants, very low‐certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis shows we are very uncertain whether fennel or fenugreek improves infant weight, whereas moringa and mixed botanical tea may increase infant weight compared to placebo. Thirteen studies (Bu Xue Sheng Ru, Chanbao, Cui Ru, banana flower -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal