Abstract:Deploying links to fact-checking websites (so-called "snoping") is a common intervention that can be used by social media users to refute misleading claims. However, its real-world effect may be limited as it suffers from low visibility and distrust towards professional fact-checkers. As a remedy, Twitter launched its community-based fact-checking system Community Notes on which fact-checks are carried out by actual Twitter users and directly shown on the fact-checked tweets. Yet, an understanding of how fact-checking via Community Notes differs from snoping is absent. In this study, we analyze differences in how contributors to Community Notes and Snopers select their targets when fact-checking social media posts. For this purpose, we analyze two unique datasets from Twitter: (a) 25,912 community-created fact-checks from Twitter's Community Notes platform; and (b) 52,505 "snopes" that debunk tweets via fact-checking replies linking to professional fact-checking websites. We find that Notes contributors and Snopers focus on different targets when fact-checking social media content. For instance, Notes contributors tend to fact-check posts from larger accounts with higher social influence and are relatively less likely to endorse/emphasize the accuracy of not misleading posts. Fact-checking targets of Notes contributors and Snopers rarely overlap; however, those overlapping exhibit a high level of agreement in the fact-checking assessment. Moreover, we demonstrate that Snopers fact-check social media posts at a higher speed. Altogether, our findings imply that different fact-checking approaches -- carried out on the same social media platform -- can result in vastly different social media posts getting fact-checked. This has important implications for future research on misinformation, which should not rely on a single fact-checking approach when compiling misinformation datasets.

Fact-Checking and Audience Engagement: A Study of Content Analysis and Audience Behavioral Data of Fact-Checking Coverage from News Media

Checking the Fact-Checkers: the Role of Source Type, Perceived Credibility, and Individual Differences in Fact-Checking Effectiveness

Community Fact-Checks Trigger Moral Outrage in Replies to Misleading Posts on Social Media

Some Observations on Fact-Checking Work with Implications for Computational Support

Community Notes vs. Snoping: How the Crowd Selects Fact-Checking Targets on Social Media

Studying the Downstream Effects of Fact-Checking on Social Media: Experiments on Correction Formats, Belief Accuracy, and Media Trust

Who Checks the Checkers? Exploring Source Credibility in Twitter's Community Notes

Unpacking Multimodal Fact-Checking: Features and Engagement of Fact-Checking Videos on Chinese TikTok (Douyin)

A Survey on Predicting the Factuality and the Bias of News Media

Effects of Time Pressure, Reward, and Information Involvement on User Management of Fake News on a Social Media Platform

How Journalists and Social Media Users Perceive Online Fact-Checking and Verification Services

Measuring Falseness in News Articles based on Concealment and Overstatement

Where Are the Facts? Searching for Fact-checked Information to Alleviate the Spread of Fake News

Learning from Fact-checkers: Analysis and Generation of Fact-checking Language

Fact Checkers Facing Fake News and Disinformation in the Digital Age: A Comparative Analysis between Spain and United Kingdom

Designing and Evaluating Presentation Strategies for Fact-Checked Content

"I don't trust them": Exploring Perceptions of Fact-checking Entities for Flagging Online Misinformation

Emotional and Mental Nuances and Technological Approaches: Optimising Fact-Check Dissemination through Cognitive Reinforcement Technique

How-to Present News on Social Media: A Causal Analysis of Editing News Headlines for Boosting User Engagement

Fake thumbs in play: A large-scale exploration of false amplification and false diminution in online news comment spaces

Framing fact-checks as a "confirmation" increases engagement with corrections of misinformation: a four-country study