Abstract:Pass selection and phase ordering are two critical compiler auto-tuning problems. Traditional heuristic methods cannot effectively address these NP-hard problems especially given the increasing number of compiler passes and diverse hardware architectures. Recent research efforts have attempted to address these problems through machine learning. However, the large search space of candidate pass sequences, the large numbers of redundant and irrelevant features, and the lack of training program instances make it difficult to learn models well. Several methods have tried to use expert knowledge to simplify the problems, such as using only the compiler passes or subsequences in the standard levels (e.g., -O1, -O2, and -O3) provided by compiler designers. However, these methods ignore other useful compiler passes that are not contained in the standard levels. Principal component analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) have been utilized to reduce the redundancy of feature data. However, these unsupervised methods retain all the information irrelevant to the performance of compilation optimization, which may mislead the subsequent model learning. To solve these problems, we propose a compiler pass selection and phase ordering approach, called Iterative Compilation based on Metric learning and Collaborative filtering (ICMC). First, we propose a data-driven method to construct pass subsequences according to the observed collaborative interactions and dependency among passes on a given program set. Therefore, we can make use of all available compiler passes and prune the search space. Then, a supervised metric learning method is utilized to retain useful feature information for compilation optimization while removing both the irrelevant and the redundant information. Based on the learned similarity metric, a neighborhood-based collaborative filtering method is employed to iteratively recommend a few superior compiler passes for each target program. Last, an iterative data enhancement method is designed to alleviate the problem of lacking training program instances and to enhance the performance of iterative pass recommendations. The experimental results using the LLVM compiler on all 32 cBench programs show the following: (1) ICMC significantly outperforms several state-of-the-art compiler phase ordering methods, (2) it performs the same or better than the standard level -O3 on all the test programs, and (3) it can reach an average performance speedup of 1.20 (up to 1.46) compared with the standard level -O3.

Learning to accelerate compiler testing

Learning to Prioritize Test Programs for Compiler Testing

Coverage Prediction for Accelerating Compiler Testing

Boosting Compiler Testing Via Eliminating Test Programs with Long-Execution-Time

Boosting Compiler Testing via Compiler Optimization Exploration

Testing the Compiler for a New-Born Programming Language: An Industrial Case Study (Experience Paper)

An Empirical Comparison Of Compiler Testing Techniques

Compiler testing: a systematic literature analysis

History-Guided Configuration Diversification for Compiler Test-Program Generation

Compiler Autotuning through Multiple Phase Learning

Compiler Test-Program Generation via Memoized Configuration Search

Compiler Auto-tuning through Multiple Phase Learning

A Survey of Compiler Testing

Test Case Prioritization for Compilers: A Text-Vector Based Approach

Compiler Testing With Relaxed Memory Models

NNSmith: Generating Diverse and Valid Test Cases for Deep Learning Compilers

Directed Test Program Generation for JIT Compiler Bug Localization

Compiler Testing using Template Java Programs

Effective Random Test Generation for Deep Learning Compilers

Compiler Bug Isolation Via Enhanced Test Program Mutation

Iterative Compilation Optimization Based on Metric Learning and Collaborative Filtering.