Abstract:In this essay I propose two different but complementary models with which to think about the relation between the novel and the historical process of globalization. The first—the globalization of the novel—works not with particular textual formations, but with the historical expansion of the novel form hand-in-hand with the colonial enterprise of Western Europe. With this interpretative concept, I review the historical and theoretical parameters that have been used to study both the historical spread of the novel from Europe to the peripheries and the constitution, at the end of the nineteenth and throughout the twentieth century, of a global system of production, reception, and translation of novels. The second model—the novelization of the global—focuses on the production of images of a globalized world as they are constructed in specific novels. My examples are novels by Jules Verne and Eduardo Ladislao Holmberg. While both writers create images of travelers spreading modern bourgeois culture throughout the world and beyond, as might be expected, Verne's images differ significantly from Holmberg's. My claim here is that the particular geopolitical determinations that marked each of these writers produced dissimilar imaginaries of the global reach of their bourgeois characters and plots. Finally, in a coda to this double hypothesis, I connect the interpretative models of the globalization of the novel and the novelization of the global with the rentrée of the concept of world literature. Recently re-introduced to academic debate by Franco Moretti, Pascale Casanova, and David Damrosch, among others, this restored notion of world literature can be understood as an attempt to conceptualize the global ubiquity of the novel since the mid-twentieth century. Here I analyze what could be called the cultural politics of world literature and the critical and pedagogical practices that are derived from this concept. I also examine its underlying claim to address, in academic practices, cosmopolitan expectations related to the production of a discourse about the world based on respect for cultural difference. In other words, my question is whether world literature, as a concept and as a practice, is capable of becoming an effective cosmopolitan discourse.

Theory and Practice of Historical Writing in Times of Globalization

The Attempts for the Ethicization of History by Neo-Marxism in Eastern Europe

History and Globalization: Reflections on Temporality

Writing PR history: issues, methods and politics

Global history and the spatial turn: from the impact of area studies to the study of critical junctures of globalization

Repositioning History for the Future ‐ Recent Academic Debates in China

Experimental History: the Appeal of Postmodernism in Historiography

Perspectives and Strategies for Rewriting the Intellectual History of Western Marxism

The Theory and Method Discussion of Social History in New Period

New Historiography of Political and Legal Thought as an Urgent Task of Legal Sciences

The Booming of Postmodernism and Public History

Crisis, Challenge and Choice: Recent Theoretical Trends of Anti-Modernism and Western Studies in Chinese History

Reinventing Modern China: Imagination and Authenticity in Chinese Historical Writing

Can Koselleck Travel? Theory of History and the Problem of the Universal

The Globalization of the Novel and the Novelization of the Global. A Critique of World Literature

[From relativism to evaluation. Recent trends in the historiography of science and the humanities]

MODERN RUSSIAN-GERMAN RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF ALTERNATIVE THEORIES OF GLOBALIZATION

Adorno and Marcuse at the Barricades?: Critical Theory, Scholar-Activism, and the Neoliberal University

Beyond the epistemological debates about the time in history, the relativity of historical time: decolonial theory facing the Western historiographical hegemony

PRACTICE MATTERS! Geographical inquiry and theories of practice

Historiographical Reading and Theoretical Reworking. An Underestimated Distinction