A Narrative Review of Research on Adjustment to Spinal Cord Injury and Mental Health: Gaps, Future Directions, and Practice Recommendations
Danielle Sandalic,Mohit Arora,Ilaria Pozzato,Grahame Simpson,James Middleton,Ashley Craig
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S259712
IF: 3.974
2022-08-06
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Danielle Sandalic, 1, 2 Mohit Arora, 1, 2 Ilaria Pozzato, 1, 2 Grahame Simpson, 1, 2 James Middleton, 1, 2 Ashley Craig 1, 2 1 Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; 2 John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Correspondence: Ashley Craig, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, Email Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in autonomic, motor, and sensory impairments that can compromise mental health. Guidelines directing the management of mental health following SCI presently address clinical anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, substance use disorders, and suicide. However, evidence suggests that perhaps as many as 70% of individuals with SCI do not develop a clinically diagnosable mental health disorder. Therefore, the authors contend that understanding non-clinical cognitive and psychological aspects of adjustment post-SCI is paramount and that the application of this knowledge to the formulation of adjustment-enhancing interventions is crucial. To assist with this endeavour, we examine existing mental health guidelines targeting SCI, and present a narrative review of research on the under-represented topics of adjustment, coping, grief, and resilience. We include mild cognitive impairment, which reflects a common factor that can compromise adjustment. Loss and stress trigger processes of adjustment, coping, grief, and resilience. SCI involves loss and stress triggering these processes, arguably without exception. Our study applied a narrative review methodology searching Google Scholar and PsychInfo databases for terms adjustment, coping, grief, resilience, and cognitive impairment. Qualitative studies and quantitative studies were selected to capture bottom-up and top-down perspectives. Reference lists of retrieved papers were searched as appropriate. Reviewed literature suggested that existing guidelines concerning mental health following SCI neglect positive processes of adjustment and suggest this neglect contributes to a deficits-based view of mental health following SCI. Research into "positive" or adjustment-enhancing processes is mostly cross-sectional, heterogenous, and poorly positioned to inform future guideline-development. Researchers should achieve consensus over the operationalisation of essential processes and overcome a fixation with "outcomes" to better inform management of mental health after SCI. Keywords: spinal cord injury, adjustment, coping, grief, resilience, cognitive impairment Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a neurological injury resulting in loss of autonomic, motor, and sensory functions with related impairments of the upper and/or lower body depending on the level and extent of spinal cord damage. Prior to the 1940s, genitourinary disorders, influenza, pneumonia, and sepsis were major causes of death with many people with SCI dying within months of their injuries. 1 Rehabilitation and management of SCI and secondary conditions has improved over the past decades, contributing to greater life expectancies. 2 Management of cognitive and psychological conditions still lags relative to improvements to medical care. Research shows adults with SCI have higher rates of alcohol dependence compared to adults without SCI (2.4% versus 1.0%), anxiety (19.3% versus 14.1%), depression (29.3% versus 9.3%), dementia (6.5% versus 0.8%), and psychological multi-morbidity (37.4% versus 23.9%). 3 The Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA) published guidelines in 1998 that recognized the need to manage cognitive and psychological conditions in SCI, but these early guidelines addressed the management of depression only. 4 Guidelines published by the PVA recently focus on a broader range of areas including clinical anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, substance use disorders, and suicidal ideation. 5 The inclusion of a greater range of diagnostic conditions is crucial and welcome; however, the Guidelines fail to address "non-diagnosable" psychological consequences of SCI. They also assume diagnostic conditions relevant to the general population can be transposed to the unique and complex experience of SCI. Qualitative studies reporting the subjective experiences of individuals with SCI suggest areas like adjustment, coping, grief, and resilience are pertinent yet under-examined aspects of adjustment to SCI. 6,7 Just under a third of individuals with SCI develop a diagnosable mental health condition post-injury. 8 This means that extant diagnostic and treatment guidelines that focus entirely on "pathologica -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary