The impact of traditional neuroimaging methods on the spatial localization of cortical areas

Timothy S Coalson,David C Van Essen,Matthew F Glasser,Timothy S. Coalson,David C. Van Essen,Matthew F. Glasser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801582115
IF: 11.1
2018-06-20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance Most human brain-imaging studies have traditionally used low-resolution images, inaccurate methods of cross-subject alignment, and extensive blurring. Recently, a high-resolution approach with more accurate alignment and minimized blurring was used by the Human Connectome Project to generate a multimodal map of human cortical areas in hundreds of individuals. Starting from these data, we systematically compared these two approaches, showing that the traditional approach is nearly three times worse than the Human Connectome Project’s improved approach in two objective measures of spatial localization of cortical areas. Furthermore, we demonstrate considerable challenges in comparing data across the two approaches and, as a result, argue that there is an urgent need for the field to adopt more accurate methods of data acquisition and analysis.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?