Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation: Effect Modification by Household Income
Joshua Garfein,Emily N. Guhl,Gretchen Swabe,Akira Sekikawa,Emma Barinas‐Mitchell,Daniel E. Forman,Jared W. Magnani
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.025591
2022-06-24
Abstract:Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Racial and ethnic differences in CR have been identified, but whether income may attenuate these disparities remains unknown. We evaluated (1) racial/ethnic differences in CR participation in a contemporary sample of insured US adults, and (2) assessed how household income modifies associations between race or ethnicity and CR participation. Methods and Results We identified 107 199 individuals with a CR‐qualifying diagnosis between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018 in Optum's de‐identified Clinformatics database. We evaluated associations between race or ethnicity and participation in CR, and assessed interaction between race or ethnicity and annual household income. The mean±SD age of all participants was 70.4±11.6 years; 37.4% were female and 76.0% were White race. Overall, 28 443 (26.5%) attended ≥1 CR sessions. After adjustment, compared with White individuals, the probability of attending CR was 31% lower for Asian individuals (95% CI, 27%–36%), 19% lower for Black individuals (95% CI, 16%–22%), and 43% lower for Hispanic individuals (95% CI, 40%–45%), all P <0.0001. The time to CR attendance was also significantly longer for Asian, Black, and Hispanic individuals. Associations between race or ethnicity and attendance at CR differed significantly across household income categories ( P interaction=0.0005); however, Asian, Black, and Hispanic individuals were less likely to attend CR at all incomes. Conclusions In a geographically and racially diverse cohort, participation in CR was low overall, and was lowest among Asian, Black, and Hispanic candidates. Household income may impact the link between race or ethnicity and attendance at CR, but substantial racial and ethnic disparities exist across incomes. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms CR cardiac rehabilitation Clinical Perspective What Is New? In a diverse cohort of insured individuals, participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains low; Asian, Black, and Hispanic individuals were less likely than White individuals to attend CR and had a longer time to CR initiation. Among Hispanic individuals only, higher income partially attenuated the lower CR participation; however, among all racial and ethnic groups, persistent disparities remained across all incomes. What Are the Clinical Implications? New initiatives—such as automatic referral, virtual delivery options, development of CR facilities in underserved or rural areas, community‐based CR, evening delivery options, and home‐based CR—are urgently needed to optimize the secondary prevention benefits of CR and promote equitable cardiovascular outcomes. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) combines structured exercise with counseling to optimize secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. 1 Participation in CR has been associated with reductions in rehospitalization, recurrent cardiovascular events, depression and anxiety, and mortality 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ; available evidence has suggested that many of these benefits also occur in low‐and middle‐income countries. 13 Professional society guidelines recommend CR for individuals with recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or other acute coronary syndrome, chronic stable angina, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, heart transplant, valve surgery, peripheral arterial disease, or heart failure. 14 Evidence also suggests that both the dose of CR sessions 15 and the time to initiation of CR 16 , 17 , 18 may impact outcomes. Nevertheless, CR participation remains low. Referral rates range from 10% to 60%, with higher rates among individuals with procedural‐qualifying diagnoses. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 Among those referred to CR, few attend, from 14% in those with AMI to 47% among those with coronary artery bypass grafting. 24 , 25 <su -Abstract Truncated-