Abstract:Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology has overcome the limitations of conventional construction management methods using advanced and automated visualization and 3D reconstruction modeling techniques. Although the mapping techniques and reconstruction modeling software can generate real-time and high-resolution descriptive textural, physical, and spatial data, they may fail to develop an accurate and complete 3D model of the construction site. To generate a quality 3D reconstruction model, the construction manager must optimize the trade-offs among three major software-selection factors: functionalities, technical capabilities, and the system hardware specifications. These factors directly affect the robust 3D reconstruction model of the construction site and objects. Accordingly, the purpose of this research was to apply nine well-established 3D reconstruction modeling software tools (DroneDeploy, COLMAP, 3DF+Zephyr, Autodesk Recap, LiMapper, PhotoModeler, 3D Survey, AgiSoft Photoscan, and Pix4D Mapper) and compare their performances and reliabilities in generating complete 3D models. The research was conducted in an eco-home building at the University of Technology, Malaysia. A series of regression analyses were conducted to compare the performances of the selected 3D reconstruction modeling software in alignment and registration, distance computing, geometric measurement, and plugin execution. Regression analysis determined that among the software programs, LiMapper had the strongest positive linear correlation with the ground truth model. Furthermore, the correlation analysis showed a statistically significant p-value for all software, except for 3D Survey. In addition, the research found that Autodesk Recap generated the most-robust and highest-quality dense point clouds. DroneDeploy can create an accurate point cloud and triangulation without using many points as required by COLMAP and LiMapper. It was concluded that most of the software is robustly, positively, and linearly correlated with the corresponding ground truth model. In the future, other factors involving software selection should be studied, such as vendor-related, user-related, and automation factors.

3D Reconstruction of Landscape Models and Archaeological Objects Based on Photo and Video Materials

3-D Map Reconstruction in Cross-country Environment

Outdoor Scene 3D Reconstruction from Multiple Point Cloud

Visual Odometry Based 3D-Reconstruction

AUGMENTED REALITY BASED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR OBJECTS 3D MODELS VISUALIZATION

3D Reconstruction of Outdoor Scenes from Synchronized Laser Range Data and Visual Image Data

Mobile3DScanner: an Online 3D Scanner for High-quality Object Reconstruction with a Mobile Device

Landscape Reconstruction with Earth-and-Timber Medieval Stronghold—Immersive Geovisualization

A METHOD OF 3D MEASUREMENT AND RECONSTRUCTION FOR CULTURAL RELICS IN MUSEUMS

Image-based 3D scene reconstruction and exploration in augmented reality

A novel no-sensors 3D model reconstruction from monocular video frames for a dynamic environment

Real-time 3D unstructured environment reconstruction utilizing VR and Kinect-based immersive teleoperation for agricultural field robots

MoReLab: A Software for User-Assisted 3D Reconstruction

A Reconstruction Methodology of Dynamic Construction Site Activities in 3D Digital Twin Models Based on Camera Information

Interactive High-Relief Reconstruction for Organic and Double-Sided Objects from a Photo

Three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from a single image using deep convolutional neural networks

REAL-TIME 3D RECONSTRUCTION FROM IMAGES TAKEN FROM AN UAV

Performance comparison analysis of 3D reconstruction modeling software in construction site visualization and mapping

3D Reconstruction Using a Linear Laser Scanner and a Camera

A Cluster-Based 3D Reconstruction System for Large-Scale Scenes

Computer System Integrated with Digital Models for Reconstruction of Underwater Structures with High Definition