Modified inelastic bouncing ball model of the Brazil nut effect and its reverse

Junius André F. Balista,Caesar Saloma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-018-0821-2

IF: 3.0103

2018-07-04

Granular Matter

Abstract:We developed the modified inelastic bouncing ball model (mIBBM) to describe the emergence of the Brazil nut effect (BNE) and its reverse (RBNE) in a vertically-vibrated binary granular mixture. The mIBBM incorporates the container-to-grains force-transmission efficiency (transmissibility) Tr to quantify the dimensionless mean void lifetime ω⟨δt⟩\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ \omega \langle \delta t\rangle $$\end{document} that acts as the segregation phase indicator where ω is the vibration angular frequency. The mixture is represented as two non-interacting inelastic balls, Ball A and Ball B. Each ball bounces with a time-of-flight τA (or τB) that depends on transmissibility TrA (or TrB) and the dimensionless container acceleration Γ, i.e., τA = τA(Γ, TrA) and τB = τB(Γ, TrB). The ball dynamics are described by the bifurcation diagrams of the dimensionless times-of-flight, ωτA(Γ, TrA) and ωτB(Γ, TrB). The probability-weighted difference ω⟨δt⟩\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ \omega \langle \delta t\rangle $$\end{document} between branches of the two diagrams is computed and interpreted as follows: ω⟨δt⟩>0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ \omega \langle \delta t\rangle > 0 $$\end{document} (occurrence of BNE), ω⟨δt⟩<0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ \omega \langle \delta t\rangle < 0 $$\end{document} (RBNE) and ω⟨δt⟩\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ \omega \langle \delta t\rangle $$\end{document} = 0 (no segregation). Segregation phases are revealed as varying shifts and widths of ω⟨δt⟩\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ \omega \langle \delta t\rangle $$\end{document} across the Γ axis. The phase boundaries in the ω⟨δt⟩\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$ \omega \langle \delta t\rangle $$\end{document}-versus-Γ diagram are sensitive to changes in TrA, TrB and ΔTr = (TrA − TrB). The mIBBM explains why the BNE is a more likely than the RBNE and predicts a segregation phase sequence that is generally consistent with related experimental results taken over a limited ω-range. Additional experiments are needed to enable a more comprehensive and precise evaluation of the mIBBM.

mechanics,materials science, multidisciplinary,physics, applied