Global Air Quality and COVID-19 Pandemic: Do We Breathe Cleaner Air?
Mehdi Amouei Torkmahalleh,Zarina Akhmetvaliyeva,Ali Darvishi Omran,Faezeh Faezeh Darvish Omran,Mohadeseh Kazemitabar,Mahtab Naseri,Motahareh Naseri,Hamed Sharifi,Milad Malekipirbazari,Enoch Kwasi Adotey,Soudabeh Gorjinezhad,Neda Eghtesadi,Sergei Sabanov,Andres Alastuey,Maria de Fatima Andrade,Giorgio Buonanno,Samara Carbone,Diego Ernesto Cardenas-Fuentes,Flemming R. Cassee,Qili Dai,Andres Henriquez,Philip K. Hopke,Petri Keronen,Haider Abbas Khwaja,Jong Kim,Markku Kulmala,Prashant Kumar,Jonilda Kushta,Joel Kuula,Jordi Massague,Tamsin Mitchell,Dennis Mooibroek,Lidia Morawska,Jarkko Niemi,Soulemane Halif Ngagine,Michael Norman,Beatriz Oyama,Pedro Oyola,Fatma Ozturk,Tuukka Petaja,Xavier Querol,Yousef Rashidi,Felipe Reyes,Matthew Ross-Jones,Tunga Salthammer,Chrysanthos Savvides,Luca Stabile,Karin Sjoberg,Karin Soderlund,Ramya Sunder Raman,Hilkka Timonen,Masakazu Umezawa,Mar Viana,Shanju Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.200567
2021-01-01
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Abstract:The global spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has challenged most countries worldwide. It was quickly recognized that reduced activities (lockdowns) during the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic produced major changes in air quality. Our objective was to assess the impacts of COVID-19 lockdowns on groundlevel PM2.5, NO2, and O-3 concentrations on a global scale. We obtained data from 34 countries, 141 cities, and 458 air monitoring stations on 5 continents (few data from Africa). On a global average basis, a 34.0% reduction in NO2 concentration and a 15.0% reduction in PM2.5 were estimated during the strict lockdown period (until April 30, 2020). Global average O-3 concentration increased by 86.0% during this same period. Individual country and continent-wise comparisons have been made between lockdown and business-as-usual periods. Universally, NO2 was the pollutant most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. These effects were likely because its emissions were from sources that were typically restricted (i.e., surface traffic and non-essential industries) by the lockdowns and its short lifetime in the atmosphere. Our results indicate that lockdown measures and resulting reduced emissions reduced exposure to most harmful pollutants and could provide global-scale health benefits. However, the increased O-3 may have substantially reduced those benefits and more detailed health assessments are required to accurately quantify the health gains. At the same, these restrictions were obtained at substantial economic costs and with other health issues (depression, suicide, spousal abuse, drug overdoses, etc.). Thus, any similar reductions in air pollution would need to be obtained without these extensive economic and other consequences produced by the imposed activity reductions.