Species richness in North Atlantic fish: Process concealed by pattern
Henrik Gislason,Jeremy Collie,Brian R. MacKenzie,Anders Nielsen,Maria de Fatima Borges,Teresa Bottari,Corina Chaves,Andrey V. Dolgov,Jakov Dulčić,Daniel Duplisea,Heino O. Fock,Didier Gascuel,Luís Gil de Sola,Jan Geert Hiddink,Remment Hofstede,Igor Isajlović,Jónas Páll Jonasson,Ole Jørgensen,Kristján Kristinsson,Gudrun Marteinsdottir,Hicham Masski,Sanja Matić‐Skoko,Mark R. Payne,Melita Peharda,Jakup Reinert,Jón Sólmundsson,Cristina Silva,Lilja Stefansdottir,Francisco Velasco,Nedo Vrgoč
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13068
2020-01-29
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Aim</h3><p>Previous analyses of marine fish species richness based on presence‐absence data have shown changes with latitude and average species size, but little is known about the underlying processes. To elucidate these processes we use metabolic, neutral and descriptive statistical models to analyse how richness responds to maximum species length, fish abundance, temperature, primary production, depth, latitude and longitude, while accounting for differences in species catchability, sampling effort and mesh size.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Data</h3><p>Results from 53,382 bottom trawl hauls representing 50 fish assemblages.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Location</h3><p>The northern Atlantic from Nova Scotia to Guinea.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Time period</h3><p>1977–2013.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>A descriptive generalized additive model was used to identify functional relationships between species richness and potential drivers, after which nonlinear estimation techniques were used to parameterize: (a) a 'best' fitting model of species richness built on the functional relationships, (b) an environmental model based on latitude, longitude and depth, and mechanistic models based on (c) metabolic and (d) neutral theory.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>In the 'best' model the number of species observed is a lognormal function of maximum species length. It increases significantly with temperature, primary production, sampling effort, and abundance, and declines with depth and, for small species, with the mesh size in the trawl. The 'best' model explains close to 90% of the deviance and the neutral, metabolic and environmental models 89%. In all four models, maximum species length and either temperature or latitude account for more than half of the deviance explained.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Main conclusions</h3><p>The two mechanistic models explain the patterns in demersal fish species richness in the northern Atlantic almost equally well. A better understanding of the underlying drivers is likely to require development of dynamic mechanistic models of richness and size evolution, fit not only to extant distributions, but also to historical environmental conditions and to past speciation and extinction rates.</p></section>
ecology,geography, physical