Transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of fibrosis development in mouse lung tissue exposed to carbon nanotubes

Vadim Zhernovkov,Tapesh Santra,Hilary Cassidy,Oleksii Rukhlenko,David Matallanas,Aleksandar Krstic,Walter Kolch,Vladimir Lobaskin,Boris N. Kholodenko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/363762
2018-07-09
Abstract:Abstract Background Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) usage has rapidly increased in the last few decades due to their unique properties, exploited in various industrial and commercial products. Certain types of CNTs cause adverse health effects, including chronic inflammation and fibrosis. Despite the large number of in vitro and in vivo studies evaluating these effects, many important questions remain unanswered due to a lack of mechanistic understanding of how CNTs induce cellular stress responses. In order to predict CNT toxicity, it is important to understand which transcriptional programs are specifically activated in response to CNTs, and what similarities and differences exist in relation to other toxic inducers exerting similar adverse effects. Results A systems biology approach was applied to reveal complex interactions at the molecular level in mouse lung tissue in response to different fibrosis inducers: two types of multi-walled CNTs, NM-401 and NRCWE-26, and bleomycin (BLM). Based on mRNA gene expression profiles, we inferred gene regulatory networks (GRNs) to capture functional hierarchical regulatory structures between genes and their regulators. We found that activities of the transcription factors (TFs) Myc, Arid5a and Mxd1 were associated with the regulation of cytokine transcription in response to CNTs, while in response to BLM treatment, Myc was associated with p53 signaling. TF Litaf was identified as the essential regulator for noncanonical signaling of TLR2/4 driven by CNTs. Despite the different nature of the lung injury caused by CNTs and BLM, we identified common stress response modules, that included DNA damage (TFs: E2f8, E2f1, Foxm1) , M1/M2 macrophage polarization (TF: Mafb), Interferon response (TFs: Irf7, Stat2 and Irf9) for all agents. Conclusions These results suggest that the reconstruction and analysis of TF-centric gene interaction networks can reveal key targets and regulators of cellular stress responses to toxic agents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?