Abstract:This study critically examines existing frameworks aimed at establishing restorative practices in community development by conducting a comparative analysis of a meso-level development framework called the Five Pillars of Development and a micro-level framework implemented by a grassroots initiative. Both frameworks were implemented in Washington, DC, and both seek to address the enduring negative externalities disinvested communities face and suggest the need for restorative practices in community development. Restorative development practices trace their roots to the field of restorative economics, which is a subfield of sustainable development. It argues that sustainability must also address the sins of the past and restore systems and systems components that have been negatively impacted by past development practices. This study aims to discern the adaptability of the more broadly applicable meso-level Five Pillars framework in capturing nuanced micro-level frameworks like the one devised by the grassroots organization in Ward 8. By identifying potential gaps, this study proposes strategies to enhance the utility of the more transferable meso-level framework, particularly for communities lacking resources to formulate their own micro-level framework. This study, therefore, contributes valuable insights and recommendations for bridging potential disparities between the meso-level and micro-level frameworks, as demonstrated in the Ward 8 case. The overarching objective is to enrich the community development field by presenting a restorative framework that refines existing meso-level approaches and facilitates opportunities for micro-level applications.

Framing cooperative development: The bridging role of cultural and symbolic value between human and material resources

A Framework for Analyzing Co-Creation Value Chain Mechanisms in Community-Based Approaches: A Literature Review

Social Capital, Member Participation, And Cooperative Performance: Evidence From China'S Zhejiang

Theoretical and analytical framework of cooperative research: A review

Benefits and Pitfalls of Social Capital for Farmer Cooperatives: Evidence from China

The role of cultural capital in the development of community leadership: toward an integrated program model

Spiraling-Up: Mapping Community Transformation with Community Capitals Framework

A Community Resilience Framework for community development practitioners building equity and adaptive capacity

Reaping what we sow: Centering values in food systems transformations research

A Matter of Framing: Analyzing Value Communication in Sustainable Business Models

An integrated conceptual framework for the study of agricultural cooperatives: from repolitisation to cooperative sustainability

The Intersection of Social Capital and Power: An Application to Rural Communities

Who takes the cake in community and economic development? ‘Going along' with metaphor to problematize the collective impact of a place-based promise programme

Co-Producing Social, Cultural, and Economic Value in Care Through a Generative and Relational Approach

Co-Productive Tools for Transcending the Divide: Building Urban–Rural Partnerships in the Spirit of the New Leipzig Charter

Defining Cultural Resources: A Case Study from the Mid-Atlantic United States

CRAFT@Large: Building Community Through Co-Making

Assessing Restorative Community Development Frameworks—A Meso-Level and Micro-Level Integrated Approach

Building Communities in Tense Times: Fostering Connectedness Between Cultures and Generations through Community Arts

Community Design Circles: Co-designing Justice and Wellbeing in Family-Community-Research Partnerships

The creative fire: An interactional framework for rural arts-based development