Climate regulation processes are linked to the functional composition of plant communities in European forests, shrublands, and grasslands
Stephan Kambach,Fabio Attorre,Irena Axmanová,Ariel Bergamini,Idoia Biurrun,Gianmaria Bonari,Maria Laura Carranza,Alessandro Chiarucci,Milan Chytrý,Jürgen Dengler,Emmanuel Garbolino,Valentin Golub,Thomas Hickler,Ute Jandt,Jan Jansen,Borja Jiménez‐Alfaro,Dirk Nikolaus Karger,Zdeňka Lososová,Valerijus Rašomavičius,Solvita Rūsiņa,Petra Sieber,Angela Stanisci,Wilfried Thuiller,Erik Welk,Niklaus E. Zimmermann,Helge Bruelheide
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17189
IF: 11.6
2024-02-21
Global Change Biology
Abstract:On the European scale, the composition of local plant communities can be linked to climate regulation processes (CRPs), such as the proportion of reflected solar irradiation, evapotranspiration and net primary productivity. These trait‐climate regulation relations are especially tight in forest and temperate shrublands but strongly depend on the habitat investigated. We conclude that any upscaling of vegetation effects on CRPs must consider the relative contribution of different habitat types. Terrestrial ecosystems affect climate by reflecting solar irradiation, evaporative cooling, and carbon sequestration. Yet very little is known about how plant traits affect climate regulation processes (CRPs) in different habitat types. Here, we used linear and random forest models to relate the community‐weighted mean and variance values of 19 plant traits (summarized into eight trait axes) to the climate‐adjusted proportion of reflected solar irradiation, evapotranspiration, and net primary productivity across 36,630 grid cells at the European extent, classified into 10 types of forest, shrubland, and grassland habitats. We found that these trait axes were more tightly linked to log evapotranspiration (with an average of 6.2% explained variation) and the proportion of reflected solar irradiation (6.1%) than to net primary productivity (4.9%). The highest variation in CRPs was explained in forest and temperate shrubland habitats. Yet, the strength and direction of these relationships were strongly habitat‐dependent. We conclude that any spatial upscaling of the effects of plant communities on CRPs must consider the relative contribution of different habitat types.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology