A priori bounds and existence of positive solutions of an elliptic system of Kirchhoff type in three or four space dimensions

Zhengmao Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-018-0600-z
2018-07-12
Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications
Abstract:Let Ω⊆Rn(n≥3)documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$Omega subseteq mathbb {R}^n(nge 3)$$end{document} be a bounded and smooth domain. Assuming that α,a,b>0documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$alpha ,a,b>0$$end{document}, p,q>0documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$p,q>0$$end{document}, we consider the following elliptic problem of Kirchhoff type 0.1-(a+b‖∇u1‖22α)Δu1=u2p+h1(x,u1,u2,∇u1,∇u2)inΩ,-Δu2=u1q+h2(x,u1,u2,∇u1,∇u2)inΩ,u1,u2>0inΩ,u1=u2=0on∂Ω.documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$egin{aligned} left{ egin{array}{llll} -(a+bVert abla u_1Vert ^{2alpha }_2)Delta u_1= u_2^{p}+h_1(x, u_1, u_2, abla u_1, abla u_2) &{} quad ext{ in }&{}quad Omega , \ -Delta u_2= u_1^{q}+h_2(x, u_1, u_2, abla u_1, abla u_2) &{}quad ext{ in } &{}quad Omega , \ u_1,u_2>0 &{} quad ext{ in } &{}quad Omega , \ u_1=u_2=0 &{} quad ext{ on }&{}quad partial Omega . end{array} ight. end{aligned}$$end{document}Under some assumptions of hi(x,u1,u2,∇u1,∇u2)(i=1,2)documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$h_i(x, u_1, u_2, abla u_1, abla u_2)(i=1, 2)$$end{document}, we get a priori bounds of the positive solutions to the problem (0.1) when n=3,4documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$n=3,4$$end{document} and p, q satisfy p,q>1documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$p,q>1$$end{document}, pq>2α+1documentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$pq>2alpha +1$$end{document} and 1p+1+1q+1>n-2ndocumentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$frac{1}{p+1}+frac{1}{q+1}>frac{n-2}{n}$$end{document}. By these estimates and the method of continuity, we get the existence for the positive solutions to the problem (0.1). Moreover, the effect of the term b‖∇u1‖22αdocumentclass[12pt]{minimal}usepackage{amsmath}usepackage{wasysym}usepackage{amsfonts}usepackage{amssymb}usepackage{amsbsy}usepackage{mathrsfs}usepackage{upgreek}setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt}egin{document}$$bVert abla u_1Vert ^{2alpha }_2$$end{document} on the solution set of the problem (0.1) also can be given in section 2.
mathematics, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?