Carving Out Protection and Redress for Migrants in the Americas Through the Judiciary: The Role of the High Courts

Helena M. Olea Rodríguez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89384-6_6
2018-07-26
Abstract:This chapter traces the evolution of legal practices in migration jurisprudence from 2014 until 2017 through a comparison of high court decisions on migration issues and migrants in selected receiving countries in the Americas (Argentina, Canada, Costa Rica, Panama and the United States). The chapter shows that courts have acquired great relevance in public policy debates in the Americas, becoming the final arbitrators of political disputes regarding the scope of state action and the protection of the rights of citizens. It also underscores how migrants and their advocates are increasingly seeking the courts’ intervention in cases related to immigration legislation and the protection of the rights of migrants. This phenomenon has resulted in strategic litigation efforts led by human rights organizations and immigration advocates, borrowing tactics from other rights campaigns. Additionally, the chapter shows that the demand for legal representation is contributing to the emergence of immigration law practices in several countries in the region. In the author’s view, the judicialization of migration is having positive and significant implications as it is contributing to elevating process standards in immigration control actions and expanding equal protection of the law to all persons under state jurisdiction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?