Sovereign credit ratings and central banks: Why do analysts pay attention to institutions?

Cristina Bodea,Raymond Hicks

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12113

2018-07-18

Economics and Politics

Abstract:Abstract This paper studies the effect of the governance of modern central banks on the ratings assigned by the credit rating agencies Standard and Poor's and Moody's. Until recently, the rating process was not public. Even still, the factors or precise methodologies used by the agencies remain uncertain and analyst judgment remains important. We argue that, given uncertainty over the future paths of countries, the quality of the central bank governance serves as a useful heuristic for a stable and favorable country trajectory. In particular, the central bank's independence signals that the government is committed to general macroeconomic stability, including debt repayment. Additionally, central bank transparency clarifies who is the principal of the bank and provides information about how the central bank understands the economy and monetary policy. Finally, tensions between the central bank and the government, as reflected by irregular turnover of central bank governors, raise doubts about countries’ future prospects. Empirically, we use a variety of models, including mediation analysis, to ensure that the effect we identify stems from the central bank governance itself, as a heuristic for the future paths of countries, and not the central bank's direct contribution to the macroeconomy, as reflected in the available data.

economics,political science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the impact of modern central bank governance on sovereign credit ratings assigned by credit rating agencies (such as Standard & Poor's and Moody's). Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Central bank independence**: The paper studies how the political independence of the central bank affects the sovereign credit rating of its country. The author believes that the independence of the central bank can be a signal of the government's commitment to macro - economic stability, and this stability is crucial for debt repayment.

2. **Central bank transparency**: In addition to independence, the paper also examines the impact of central bank transparency on the credit rating of its country. Transparency can not only reduce analysts' uncertainty about the country's economic prospects, but also improve the predictability of monetary policy, thereby helping to stabilize inflation expectations and prices.

3. **Irregular turnover of senior central bank personnel**: The paper analyzes the negative impact of the irregular replacement of senior central bank management personnel on credit ratings. Such irregular replacement may reflect the tense relationship between the government and the central bank, which in turn raises concerns about the future economic stability of the country.

Through these studies, the paper aims to reveal how central bank governance can be a useful heuristic indicator for evaluating a country's future economic path, rather than directly contributing to macro - economic performance. The author uses multiple models, including mediation analysis, to ensure that the identified effects do indeed come from central bank governance itself, rather than other factors.

Overall, this paper attempts to fill the research gap in the existing literature on the impact of central bank governance on sovereign credit ratings and provides empirical evidence to support its arguments.