A Retrospective Analysis of Serum D-Dimer Levels for the Exclusion of Acute Aortic Dissection
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S373335
2022-07-28
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Abstract:Tony Zitek, 1 Mani Hashemi, 2 Sara Zagroba, 2 Valori H Slane 2 1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA; 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Kendall Regional Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA Correspondence: Tony Zitek, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Road, Miami Beach, FL, 33140, USA, Tel +1-305-674-2121 Ext 56632, Email Purpose: Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a highly fatal disorder if not promptly diagnosed. Some international studies have suggested that serum d-dimer levels may be used to exclude AAD, but data are limited. We sought to confirm that d-dimer levels are elevated in American patients with AAD. Additionally, we sought to estimate the test characteristics of the d-dimer for AAD. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients in the Hospital Corporation of America database who arrived at the hospital between 2015 and 2019. We queried the database to find patients who had a diagnosis of AAD or (nonspecific) chest pain, and who also had a d-dimer performed within 24 hours of arrival at the hospital. The median d-dimer was compared in those diagnosed with AAD versus chest pain. We estimated the test characteristics of d-dimer for AAD at the standard cutoff value of 500 ng/mL. Results: In total, 48,902 patients met the criteria for analysis, including 572 with AAD and 48,330 with chest pain. The median d-dimers were 2455 ng/mL and 385 ng/mL for the AAD and chest pain groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Using a cutoff of 500 ng/mL, the sensitivity of the d-dimer was 91.1% and the specificity was 71.4%. Conclusion: Serum d-dimer values are higher in patients with AAD than in those with nonspecific chest pain. At the standard cutoff of 500 ng/mL, the serum d-dimer has a high sensitivity for AAD, but not high enough that d-dimer levels alone can be used in isolation to exclude AAD. Keywords: aorta, dissection, d-dimer, diagnosis Aortic dissection (a splitting of the wall of the aorta) is a rapidly fatal disease if not promptly diagnosed. Currently, aortic dissection is primarily diagnosed with computed tomography angiography of the chest, which is expensive and carries a risk of radiation. Some prior studies have demonstrated that blood levels of a protein fragment called d-dimer are elevated in patients with aortic dissection, but these studies have not been definitive. The authors therefore performed a study to further assess whether blood d-dimer levels may be useful in assessing patients for possible aortic dissection. The authors used a database from a large hospital system to find patients who had a d-dimer performed and who were either diagnosed with aortic dissection or nonspecific chest pain. In total, the authors analyzed 48,902 patients, including 572 with AAD and 48,330 with nonspecific chest pain. The median d-dimers were 2455 ng/mL and 385 ng/mL for the aortic dissection and chest pain groups, respectively. Ultimately, blood d-dimer levels were found to be elevated in the vast majority of patients (91%) with aortic dissection, but not all of them. This indicates that a normal blood d-dimer level makes it unlikely that the patient has an aortic dissection, but it does not fully rule out the disease. Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a highly fatal disorder if not promptly diagnosed, with the rate of mortality reaching 1% to 2% per hour without treatment. 1,2 Aortic dissection is primarily diagnosed with computed tomography (CT) angiography of the chest, 3 which is expensive, time consuming, and carries a risk of radiation. 4 A universal, rapid screening biomarker could thus be very useful to exclude the diagnosis of AAD. To date, there are several published studies that have evaluated the use of D-dimer to rule-out the diagnosis of AAD, 5–15 and there are also systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have aggregated the data. 16–20 These publications have reported higher d-dimer levels in patients with AAD as compared to controls, and they have reported that an elevated d-dimer level has a higher sensitivity for AAD. However, some studies have reported as many 12–18% of patients with AAD have a normal d-dimer level. 7,9 Additionally, all published studies to date have included relatively small numbers of patients with AAD with the largest having 241 such patients, 15 and only one published study has included patients from the United States. 5 Some recent publications with European and Asian populations have suggested that the combination of a clinical evaluation and a normal d-dimer value can rule out AAD. 14,15 However, as d-dimer values are kno -Abstract Truncated-