Neurocognitive profiles in the prodrome to psychosis in NAPLS-1

Eva Velthorst,Eric C. Meyer,Anthony J. Giuliano,Jean Addington,Kristin S. Cadenhead,Tyrone D. Cannon,Barbara A. Cornblatt,Thomas H. McGlashan,Diana O. Perkins,Ming T. Tsuang,Elaine F. Walker,Scott W. Woods,Carrie E. Bearden,Larry J. Seidman,Eva Velthorst,Jean Addington
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.07.038
IF: 4.662
2019-02-01
Schizophrenia Research
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Most studies of neurocognitive functioning in Clinical High Risk (CHR) cohorts have examined group averages, likely concealing heterogeneous subgroups. We aimed to identify neurocognitive subgroups and to explore associated outcomes.METHODS: Data were acquired from 324 participants (mean age 18.4) in the first phase of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS-1), a multi-site consortium following individuals for up to 2 1/2 years. We applied Ward's method for hierarchical clustering data to 8 baseline neurocognitive measures, in 166 CHR individuals, 49 non-CHR youth with a family history of psychosis, and 109 healthy controls. We tested whether cluster membership was associated with conversion to psychosis, social and role functioning, and follow-up diagnosis. Analyses were repeated after data were clustered based on independently developed clinical decision rules.RESULTS: Four neurocognitive clusters were identified: Significantly Impaired (n = 33); Mildly Impaired (n = 82); Normal (n = 145) and High (n = 64). The Significantly Impaired subgroup demonstrated the largest deviations on processing speed and memory tasks and had a conversion rate of 58%, a 40% chance of developing a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis (compared to 24.4% in the Mildly Impaired, and 10.3% in the other two groups combined), and significantly worse functioning at baseline and 12-months. Data clustered using clinical decision rules yielded similar results, pointing to high convergent validity.CONCLUSION: Neurocognitive profiles vary substantially in their severity and are associated with diagnostic and functional outcome, underscoring neurocognition as a predictor of illness outcomes. These findings, if replicated, are a first step toward personalized treatment for individuals at-risk for psychosis.
psychiatry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?