Outcomes following percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) treatment for neurogenic and idiopathic overactive bladder

Katarina Ivana Tudor,Jai H. Seth,Martina D. Liechti,Juliana Ochulor,Gwen Gonzales,Collette Haslam,Zoe Fox,Mahreen Pakzad,Jalesh N. Panicker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-018-0553-8
2018-08-03
Clinical Autonomic Research
Abstract:PurposePercutaneous tibial nerve stimulation is a minimally invasive neuromodulation technique for treating overactive bladder symptoms. The aim of this study was to assess safety, efficacy and impact on quality of life of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in neurological patients reporting overactive bladder symptoms.MethodsIn this retrospective evaluation over 18 months at a tertiary healthcare centre, patients finding first-line treatments for overactive bladder ineffective or intolerable underwent a standard 12-week course of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (Urgent PC, Uroplasty). Symptoms were evaluated using standardised International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires and bladder diaries.ResultsOf 74 patients (52 women, 22 men, mean age 56 years), 49 (66.2%) patients had neurological disorder [19 (25.7%) multiple sclerosis and 30 (40.5%) other neurological conditions] and 25 (33.8%) idiopathic overactive bladder. Overall for the entire cohort significant improvements were recorded after 12 weeks in the following domains: 24-h frequency on bladder diary − 1.67 (− 3.0, 0.33) (p = 0.002), number of incontinent episodes on bladder diary − 0.0 (− 1, 0) (p = 0.01), incontinence severity on bladder diary 0 (− 0.33, 0) (p = 0.007), OAB symptoms − 3 (− 11.5, 5) (p = 0.01), and quality of life − 16 (− 57, 6.5) (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in outcomes between patients with idiopathic and neurogenic overactive bladder.ConclusionsPercutaneous tibial nerve stimulation appears to be a possible promising alternative for patients with neurological disorder reporting overactive bladder symptoms who find first-line treatments either ineffective or intolerable. However, a properly designed study is required to address safety and efficacy.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?