Abstract:One of the main challenges of embodied theories is accounting for meanings of abstract words. The most common explanation is that abstract words, like concrete ones, are grounded in perception and action systems. According to other explanations, abstract words, differently from concrete ones, would activate situations and introspection; alternatively, they would be represented through metaphoric mapping. However, evidence provided so far pertains to specific domains. To be able to account for abstract words in their variety we argue it is necessary to take into account not only the fact that language is grounded in the sensorimotor system, but also that language represents a linguistic-social experience. To study abstractness as a continuum we combined a concrete (C) verb with both a concrete and an abstract (A) noun; and an abstract verb with the same nouns previously used (grasp vs. describe a flower vs. a concept). To disambiguate between the semantic meaning and the grammatical class of the words, we focused on two syntactically different languages: German and Italian. Compatible combinations (CC, AA) were processed faster than mixed ones (CA, AC). This is in line with the idea that abstract and concrete words are processed preferentially in parallel systems - abstract in the language system and concrete more in the motor system, thus costs of processing within one system are the lowest. This parallel processing takes place most probably within different anatomically predefined routes. With mixed combinations, when the concrete word preceded the abstract one (CA), participants were faster, regardless of the grammatical class and the spoken language. This is probably due to the peculiar mode of acquisition of abstract words, as they are acquired more linguistically than perceptually. Results confirm embodied theories which assign a crucial role to both perception-action and linguistic experience for abstract words.

How Concrete Do We Get Telling Stories?

Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual

Low-Resource Event Extraction via Share-and-Transfer and Remaining Challenges

Narrative Variations in a Virtual Storyteller

When Abstract Becomes Concrete: Naturalistic Encoding of Concepts in the Brain

Abstract and concrete sentences, embodiment, and languages

Quantifying the narrative flow of imagined versus autobiographical stories

A Narratology-Based Framework for Storyline Extraction

Using large language models to create narrative events

Imagined versus Remembered Stories: Quantifying Differences in Narrative Flow

Event Causality Is Key to Computational Story Understanding

Generating Different Story Tellings from Semantic Representations of Narrative

Annotating High-Level Structures of Short Stories and Personal Anecdotes

Exploring the affordances of text and picture stories

Spinning the stories of our lives

A Survey on Event-based News Narrative Extraction

Neural dynamics of semantic control underlying generative storytelling

What is Wrong with Language Models that Can Not Tell a Story?

Exploring aspects of similarity between spoken personal narratives by disentangling them into narrative clause types

Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design.

It's the Same Old Story! Enriching Event-Centric Knowledge Graphs by Narrative Aspects