Characteristic and Origin of Dolomites in the Third and Fourth Members of Leikoupo Formation of the Middle Triassic in NW Sichuan Basin: Constraints in Mineralogical, Petrographic and Geochemical Data
Qian YiXiong,Wu HengZhi,Zhou LingFang,Huang KangJian,Deng MeiZhou,Li Yong,Dong ShaoFeng,Wang QiongXian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18654/1000-0569/2019.04.12
IF: 1.468
2019-01-01
Acta Petrologica Sinica
Abstract:Dolomitization is an important depositional and diagenesis process greatly affecting the reservoir quality. Based on the studies with regard to petrography, carbon, oxygen, strontium and magnesium isotopes as well as the data of major and minor elements composition and ratios of bulk dolomites, seven types of dolomites has been systematic classified, i.e. (1) micritic dolomite with gypsum or anhydrite co-exist AD0; (2) micritic dolomite D0; (3) micritic and microcrystalline dolomite D1; (4) microcrystalline and finely crystalline dolomite D2; (5) fully dolomitized microbialite MD; (6) calcium bearing dolomite CD; and (7) calcitized micritic and microcrystalline dolomite (de-dolomite) CD0, CD1. The average sequentiality (8) for different dolomites is lower compared with typical dolomite in reflux dolomitization model, and the concentration of Mn and Fe are also rather lower with predominantly dark purple, purplish red, and blue purple, less common by rose-red, orange red and yellow-red (CL). The stable isotope for values for seven different type dolomites are delta C-13(PDB) (1.95 parts per thousand similar to 2.46 parts per thousand) and delta O-18(PDB) (-4.05 parts per thousand similar to 2.70 parts per thousand), while for Sr-87/Sr-86 (0.70778 similar to 0.70807) and delta Mg-26(-1.872 parts per thousand similar to -2.124 parts per thousand), indicating that the delta C-13(PDB) and Sr-87/Sr-86 of dolomites within the range of globe sea-water change and minor negative offset or positive for delta O-18(PDB) in the Middle Triassic. A few D0 and MD as well as AD0 are rich in the concentration of silicon, aluminum with present by a few low or high magnesium calcite, clay minerals and organic matters. Except for the concentration (Sr2+ + Ba2+) of few samples is large than the (Mn2+ + Fe2+ + Zn2+), which most of them assumed as predominantly calcite and subordinate aragonite structure for proto-dolomites. From the type of D2 to D1, or D0 and AD0, the concentration Sr and Na, most of minor-elements and ratios of bulk various dolomites, as well as delta O-18 shows an increasing tendency, imply that would been in an euryhaline, penesaline and alkaline, hyperhaline sedimentary environment. Heterogeneous geochemical data prevailing in same type dolomite reveals that multi-controlling factors effect on the dolomitization process, which would be owing to shallowing upward of meter-scale cycles of deposition unites, in a dominantly arid and hot with occasional humid intervening climatic condition, the change lateral in lithofacies or microfacies arguably ascribed to the migration of margin or barrier of microbialite, and beach, shoal or microbial mats or bioherms. Therefore, the composite of reflux and Sabakha dolomitization model has been put forward to decipher the distribution of seven types of dolomites: i.e., the AD0 or D0 most likely to been formed in a shallow lagoon, belong "Sabkha" in supratidal, D0, D1 and MD (mediation of micreobes) and a few AD0 in a restricted lagoon of intertidal, MD, CD1 and CD took place between the intertidal and subtidal in margin or barrier of platform, D0, D2, CD1 and MD (in microbial mats, mounds or bioherms) in the flat (or tidal channels) or an open lagoon and the open platform, and the three lately mention cases believed to closely associate with reflux dolomitization, driven by either topographic head-driven or density-difference by evaporation pump.