Testing the Influence of Social Axioms on Internet Gaming Disorder Tendency with a Cross-Lagged Panel Model: a One-Year Longitudinal Study
Hong Mian Yang,Kwok Kit Tong,Yun Li,Vivienne Y. K. Tao,Meng Xuan Zhang,Anise M. S. Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00532-z
IF: 8
2021-04-27
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
Abstract:Gaming-specific beliefs on the functions and/or consequences of gaming have consistently been shown to be risk factors for Internet gaming disorder (IGD). However, there is a scarcity of research on the effects of generalized beliefs about the world (i.e., social axioms) on IGD tendency. This 1-year longitudinal study was designed to test whether and which social axioms would have a prospective influence on IGD tendency. One hundred ninety-five Chinese university students (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.86, female = 72.3%) voluntarily participated in both the baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys. Social cynicism, but not four other social axioms (i.e., fate control, reward for application, social complexity, and religiosity), was found to be significantly associated with baseline and follow-up IGD tendency. Using a cross-lagged panel model, while controlling for baseline IGD tendency and grade point average (GPA), baseline social cynicism belief still had a positive effect on follow-up IGD tendency at a marginal significance level (<i>p</i> = .07). Moreover, students' baseline GPA predicted lower follow-up IGD tendency (<i>β</i> = −.17, <i>p</i> < .01) but not vice versa. Our findings suggested that preventive interventions may consider modifying not only gaming-specific beliefs but also general beliefs, such as social cynicism. They also shed light on the importance of identifying groups that are at risk for IGD tendency, such as low-achievement students, for interventions.
psychiatry,substance abuse,psychology, clinical