Abstract:When the Arab Spring gave way to demonstrations in Syria in 2011, the Kurds in the country were also full of hope. While they were going into the streets, the Kurdish political parties were debating what their people should do and offering competing visions for the future. Then in July 2012, the regime unexpectedly withdrew its forces from the Kurdish regions (Rojava). Suddenly, a revolutionary situation emerged in Rojava: a mobilized population and several political parties claiming leadership and offering competing political projects for a new society. Among these parties, only the Democratic Union Party (PYD) managed to move into the power vacuum and establish its control over large areas. Its rivals were unable to stop the rapid rise of this relatively young organization and fast erosion of their own base. How did the PYD manage to become the dominant organization even though it had rarely drawn attention before the civil war? This question raises the larger problem of how a revolutionary organization becomes the dominant one among competitors. Even though multiple organizations competing in a single revolution is a recurrent phenomenon, we still lack a comprehensive framework specifically focusing on this issue. In this paper, I argue for an approach based on legitimation: for people to follow a certain organization over others, they should see it as a legitimate leader. Bringing together the insights of the political and organizational legitimacy literatures, I identify three processes of legitimation for revolutionary organizations: ideological/normative congruence, effective organizational capacity, and accumulation of prestige. Drawing upon participant observation and 30 in-depth interviews with Kurdish individuals collected during fieldwork in Iraq, Germany, and the United States between 2016 and 2019, I demonstrate that the PYD has outperformed its contenders and managed to legitimate its leadership through these three processes.

The dilemma of the Kurdish struggle in Turkey

Kurdish Politics in the Global Context

Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy Toward Syria: The Return of Securitization

Moral Economy Redux: Social Protests in Turkey after the 2001 Economic Crisis

Impact of the transnationalization of the Syrian civil war on Turkey: conflict spillover cases of ISIS and PYD-YPG/PKK

‘Am I a terrorist or an educator?’ Turkish asylum seekers narratives on education rights violations after a crackdown following the 2016 failed coup attempt in Turkey

Developments in the Kurdish Issue in Syria and Turkey in 2017

Beyond postcolonial heteronomy: Kurdish question, decolonisation, and the relational time of democratic confederalism

Delisting the PKK as a Terrorist Organization

Neoliberal developmentalism, authoritarian populism, and extractivism in the countryside: the Soma mining disaster in Turkey

Revisiting the Battle of Dumlupınar: an archaeological and ethnographical exploration of the Turkish War of Independence

Sociolinguistic situation of Kurdish in Turkey: Sociopolitical factors and language use patterns

The role of the opposition in autocratisation: the case of Turkey

Neoliberal Populism in Turkey and Its Crisis

Another perspective regarding the 2020 War in Karabakh: The relationship between a frozen conflict and securitization

Competing revolutionaries: Legitimacy and leadership in revolutionary situations

Democratic backsliding and the media: the convergence of news narratives in Turkey

'Not a party to this crime': The reciprocal constitution of identity and morality by signatories of the Academics for Peace petition in Turkey

Combatting violence against women in Turkey: structural obstacles

Game-theoretic agent-based modelling of micro-level conflict: Evidence from the ISIS-Kurdish war

Ottoman,Islamic,or Turkey?——Brief Analysis of Revolutionary Discourse Problems in Turkish Independence Movement