Abstract:In this paper, a sparse learning algorithm, probabilistic classification vector machines (PCVMs), is proposed. We analyze relevance vector machines (RVMs) for classification problems and observe that adopting the same prior for different classes may lead to unstable solutions. In order to tackle this problem, a signed and truncated Gaussian prior is adopted over every weight in PCVMs, where the sign of prior is determined by the class label, i.e., +1 or -1. The truncated Gaussian prior not only restricts the sign of weights but also leads to a sparse estimation of weight vectors, and thus controls the complexity of the model. In PCVMs, the kernel parameters can be optimized simultaneously within the training algorithm. The performance of PCVMs is extensively evaluated on four synthetic data sets and 13 benchmark data sets using three performance metrics, error rate (ERR), area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUC), and root mean squared error (RMSE). We compare PCVMs with soft-margin support vector machines (SVM(Soft)), hard-margin support vector machines (SVM(Hard)), SVM with the kernel parameters optimized by PCVMs (SVM(PCVM)), relevance vector machines (RVMs), and some other baseline classifiers. Through five replications of twofold cross-validation F test, i.e., 5 x 2 cross-validation F test, over single data sets and Friedman test with the corresponding post-hoc test to compare these algorithms over multiple data sets, we notice that PCVMs outperform other algorithms, including SVM(Soft), SVM(Hard), RVM, and SVM(PCVM), on most of the data sets under the three metrics, especially under AUC. Our results also reveal that the performance of SVM(PCVM) is slightly better than SVM(Soft), implying that the parameter optimization algorithm in PCVMs is better than cross validation in terms of performance and computational complexity. In this paper, we also discuss the superiority of PCVMs' formulation using maximum a posteriori (MAP) analysis and margin analysis, which explain the empirical success of PCVMs.

Possibilistic classification by support vector networks

A fuzzy portfolio selection method based on possibilistic mean and variance

Fuzzy Support Vector Classification Based on Possibility Theory

Probabilistic Classification Vector Machines.

Fuzzy output support vector machines for classification

Fuzzy Chance Constrained Support Vector Machine

Fuzzy Support Vector Machine For Regression Estimation

Fuzzy support vector clustering

Probabilistic Classification using Fuzzy Support Vector Machines

Probabilistic Classification Vector Machines for Multiclass Classification

A New Classification Algorithm Research

Fuzzy Support Vector Machine With A New Fuzzy Membership Function For Pattern Classification

Support Vector Machine Classifier Based on Fuzzy Partition and Neighborhood Pairs

Fuzzy Support Vector Machines Based on Classification

Probabilistic Safety Regions Via Finite Families of Scalable Classifiers

Fuzzy support vector machines for solving two-class problems

Multiclass Probabilistic Classification Vector Machine

A Fuzzy SVM Classification Algorithm from Group Probabilities Problem

Probabilistic Classification Vector Machine for Multi-Class Classification

Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Bounded V-Support Vector Machines with Polyhedral Perturbations

Support Vector Machines for Classification Problems