Application of Quantitative Indexes of FDG PET to Treatment Response Evaluation in Indolent Lymphoma

Hyun Joo Kim,Reeree Lee,Hongyoon Choi,Jin Chul Paeng,Gi Jeong Cheon,Dong Soo Lee,June-Key Chung,Keon Wook Kang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-018-0543-8
2018-08-30
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Abstract:<h3 class="a-plus-plus">Abstract</h3> <span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec1"> <h3 class="a-plus-plus">Purpose</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">Although <sup class="a-plus-plus">18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a standard imaging modality for response evaluation in FDG-avid lymphoma, there is a controversy using FDG PET in indolent lymphoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of quantitative indexes on FDG PET in response evaluation of the indolent lymphoma.</p> </span> <span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec2"> <h3 class="a-plus-plus">Methods</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">Fifty-seven indolent lymphoma patients who completed chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at baseline, interim, and end of treatment (EOT). Response was determined by Lugano classification, and progression-free survival (PFS) by follow-up data. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub class="a-plus-plus">max</sub>), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured in the single hottest lesion (target A) or five hottest lesions (target B). Their efficacies regarding response evaluation and PFS prediction were evaluated.</p> </span> <span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec3"> <h3 class="a-plus-plus">Results</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">On EOT PET, SUV<sub class="a-plus-plus">max</sub>, and MTV of both targets were well associated with visual analysis. Changes between initial and EOT PET were not significantly different between CR and non-CR groups. On interim PET, SUV<sub class="a-plus-plus">max</sub>, and %ΔSUV<sub class="a-plus-plus">max</sub> in both targets were significantly different between CR and non-CR groups. For prediction of PFS, most tested indexes were significant on EOT and interim PET, with SUV<sub class="a-plus-plus">max</sub> being the most significant prognostic factor.</p> </span> <span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec4"> <h3 class="a-plus-plus">Conclusion</h3> <p class="a-plus-plus">Quantitative indexes of FDG PET are well associated with Lugano classification in indolent lymphoma. SUV<sub class="a-plus-plus">max</sub> measured in the single hottest lesion can be effective in response evaluation and prognosis prediction on interim and EOT PET.</p> </span>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?