Abstract:The authors draw on case studies of change-oriented school leadership and on other research to promote a discussion of how administrator preparation must change if we are to meet children's needs. Most programs for training school administrators range in quality from embarrassing to disastrous.[1] THE EDUCATIONAL challenge of the 21st century is to achieve higher levels of learning for all children. To attain this all, public school teachers and administrators must undertake changes that are specifically and significantly directed toward that end. While it is well-recognized that schools now serve linguistically, racially, and ethnically diverse student populations, educational administration programs have not responded to this diversity of needs. Daniel Griffiths, a long-time observer of educational administration whose words appear at the beginning of this article, may be more direct and damning of current preparation programs than are most commentators. However, he is not alone in his concern about the quality of programs and the implications of that quality for public education. Even though the reform of administration preparation programs has been debated and discussed since 1987,[2] to our knowledge there have been no fundamental changes in such programs, but only isolated initiatives that have refined components of existing programs.[3] One possible reason for the inertia found in both initial preparation and continuing professional development programs for principals and superintendents is the absence of models of change-oriented leadership. Recent research and development at the National Center for School Leadership (NCSL) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign,[4] has focused on conceptions of leadership within changing environments and on case studies of current administrators who have reputations for success in such environments. In this article we will draw on this research to promote a discussion of how administrator preparation must change if we are to meet children's needs. At NCSL we embrace a specialized view of leadership throughout our research programs, while acknowledging that no one particular form of leadership is effective in every imaginable situation. Similarly, our conceptions of leadership and leaders are inherently tied to the nature of relationships between school leaders, school culture and climate, and the community the school serves. Position titles and job descriptions do not define qualities of effective leaders. Rather, the processes the participants engage in when presented with specific educational problems are what characterize their effectiveness. One fundamental issue that runs through all our work is the degree to which leaders can initiate, nurture, and maintain changes that benefit students. This basic theme led us to develop four postulates as essential elements of change-oriented leadership that benefits students: 1. Leaders for change are transformational and engage in relationships with school personnel that inspire all participants to accept and accomplish goals that rise above self-interest. 2. Leaders for change create collaborative, inclusive decision-making processes. 3. Leaders for change are oriented toward continuous learning; they believe that the school's context partially defines the school's needs and thus that responses to those needs must be tailored to the school's context. 4. Leaders for change use a variety of student outcomes to evaluate the effects of improvement efforts.[5] To test these postulates, we began four case studies of schools whose principals and teachers had local and national reputations for commitment to and progress toward change. We examined the claim of progress at each of these schools. Once we were able to determine that student benefits had occurred, we then studied the four schools to better understand how their principals and teachers managed to effect change within their buildings. …

School leadership and school improvement: an examination of school readiness factors

A Model of Positive School Leadership to Improve Teacher Wellbeing

Principal Leadership in a Time of Change

What We Know about Successful School Leadership from Australian Cases and an Open Systems Model of School Leadership

Modelling the effects of principal leadership and school capacity on teacher professional learning in Hong Kong primary schools

From Compliance to Improvement: How School Leaders Make Sense of Institutional and Technical Demands When Implementing a Continuous Improvement Process

Lessons from Two Decades of Research about Successful School Leadership in England: A Humanistic Approach

Different Patterns of Relationships Between Principal Leadership and 15-Year-Old Students’ Science Learning: How School Resources, Teacher Quality, and School Socioeconomic Status Make a Difference

The Effect of Principal Behaviors on Student, Teacher, and School Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature

Department-Head Leadership for School Improvement

Leaders on leadership: the impressions of primary school head teachers and subject leaders

“You have a status”: a case study of parent leadership in a U.S. school readiness initiative

Preparing Leaders for Change-Oriented Schools.

Preparing Principals to Improve Student Achievement

Within the Accountability Era: Principals' Instructional Leadership Behaviors and Student Achievement

Stance of numerous leadership styles and their effect on teaching to sustain academic performance at the high school level

Improving low-performing high schools: searching for evidence of promise

Do teacher beliefs mediate leadership and teacher behaviors? Testing teacher self-efficacy's mediation role between leadership for learning and teacher outcomes

Perceived Effectiveness of Leadership Styles for Improvement in Public Schools of Punjab

The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis

School leadership that supports health promotion in schools: A systematic literature review