Abstract:Motivation Strategies to develop manufacturing industry are the subject of lively debate over whether to follow or defy national comparative advantage. Electric vehicles (EVs), a major change for automobile manufacturers, are no exception. Despite the US government's promotion of global integration to activate the semi‐invisible hand of market forces, neither traditional Detroit automakers nor new firms, even with government grants or loans, were able to launch EVs on the world market promptly, with the notable exception of Tesla. In China, the government helped dozens of domestic electric vehicle manufacturers enter the market through formidable government subsidies. However, none of China's manufacturers, other than Wuling, were able to surpass Tesla in sales in China. The rapid growth of Tesla and Wuling without relying heavily on government protection and subsidies raises the question of whether their success can be attributed to other forms of state intervention. Purpose What policies and strategies enable manufacturers to develop and market a new technology, such as EVs? What can we learn by comparing the experiences of US and Chinese vehicle manufacturers? We consider these questions and what the implications are for debates about industrial development strategy. Methods and approach We compare four carmaking firms—GM, Tesla, BYD, and Wuling—their business strategies and their interactions with the US and Chinese states. We draw on company reports, government documents, and press reports. Findings Both China and the US employed semi‐developmentalist, semi‐neoliberal policies to promote the manufacture of EVs. The US subsidized research and development in its automobile industry and provided incentives to consumers. It has subsequently moved to lending to the most promising firms for EV production. China, in contrast, has selectively subsidized EV firms all the way from development to marketing. Subsidies from the US government have been steady: they are expected to stay this way in the near term. However, the fastest‐growing carmakers have used outward foreign direct investment to gain competitive advantage. China's subsidies, on the other hand, have been unstable: linked to the performance of the target firms. The higher the firm's profit, the lower the subsidies and vice versa. China has been careful with subsidies to prevent rent seeking and moral hazard. Neither following nor defying comparative advantage explains the strategies followed by the four firms: comparative advantage considerations have been tempered by the possibilities of foreign investment. Policy implications The results imply that traditional developmental strategies have resorted to inward foreign direct investment in high‐income countries as a means to learn technologies and outward foreign direct investment in low‐ and medium‐income countries as a way to reduce production costs, but have missed the comparative advantage of outward and inward foreign direct investment, and strategic mixes of these, when developing and diffusing radical innovation like EVs.

‘Made in China 2025’: the development of a new energy vehicle industry in China

The status quo and future trends of new energy vehicle power batteries in China — Analysis from policy perspective

Development of New-Energy Vehicles under the Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Strategy in China

Case Study - China's regulatory impact on electric mobility development and the effects on power generation and the distribution grid

Developing electric vehicles in China and the United States: Revisiting debates on industrial strategy

The Evolution of China’s New Energy Vehicle Industry from the Perspective of a Technology–Market–Policy Framework

The Current Dilemma and Future Path of China’s Electric Vehicles

Incentive policies from 2006 to 2016 and new energy vehicle adoption in 2010–2020 in China

New Energy Vehicles Industry in China: Developments and Challenges

The trajectory of China's new energy vehicles policy

Is China's industrial policy effective? An empirical study of the new energy vehicles industry

Spatial distribution patterns and influencing factors of China's new energy vehicle industry

New energy vehicles in China: policies, demonstration, and progress

Controversies and Policy Considerations Regarding the Promotion of New Energy Vehicles in China

Light-duty Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Evolution, Competition, and Outlook

Competition and Coordination: Regional Dynamics in the Rise of China's New Energy Vehicle Industry

Analyzing the Challenges of BYD in the Future Based on the Current Electric Vehicle Market Situation

The role of government in the innovation ecology of high-tech industries: a case study of China's new energy vehicle industry

THE RESEARCH OF THE INTERNATIONALIZATION PATH OF CHINA'S NEW ENERGY VEHICLE INDUSTRY

Study on the New Energy Vehicle Industry in China

From “obligated embeddedness” to “obligated Chineseness”? Bargaining processes and evolution of international automotive firms in China's New Energy Vehicle sector