Abstract:Background/Context Teach For America (TFA) affiliates with universities in most of its 40 regions nationally; however, few researchers intentionally study the content and processes of a partnership between TFA and a college of education. Purpose/Research Question/Focus of Study To ensure that investments both organizations were making had a direct and positive relationship with the constituents, leaders from TFA and Georgia State University began a joint study of our partnership. Researchers believed that participatory collaborative research, utilizing the emic insights, could illuminate needed modifications to best serve novice teachers. Research conducted by only one of the partners is less likely to promote mutuality of respect, reveal salient cultural reference points, honor all stakeholder voices, and enhance a common understanding. The driving question for this strand of this comprehensive 5-year inquiry: What happens when two seemingly disparate institutions with the same mission for educational equity come together to develop urban educators? Participants Thirty-three purposefully selected stakeholders were individually interviewed and included (a) university and TFA leadership (e.g., executive director, deans, department chairs) who were involved in the initiation of this partnership (n = 16); and (b) university coaches, faculty, and TFA Program Directors (PDs) who worked as supervisors and mentors in the field and/or instructors in coursework (n = 17). Additionally, 45 TFA Corps Members’ written reflections about their participation in their degree program provided feedback and analysis of their program and the partnership. Research Design University faculty and TFA personnel codesigned a multiyear qualitative examination of their joint enterprise of developing urban teachers to promote equitable educative opportunities for all children. A contribution of this study is the empirical and coconstructed nature of its design. Data Collection/Analysis The team analyzed data from transcribed verbatim interviews conducted with university and TFA participants, and documents/publications such as Web sites, Memoranda of Understanding, mission statements, emails, meeting memos, program handbook, course syllabi, and TFA Corps Member reflections. Findings/Results An examination of this partnership revealed struggles with: (a) contract negotiation, (b) communication, (c) procedural and pragmatic congruence, (d) response to constituent needs, and (e) creation of an authentic and sustainable partnership. Conclusions/Recommendations Our partnership fluctuated between an instrumental process focused on survival of complexities and triaging crises and self-focused explorations of organizational priorities and possibilities. Stakeholders collaborated to move beyond institutional paradigms for practices toward more mutually constructed engagements. Recommendations are offered to guide other university/TFA partners as they collaborate for the purpose of urban teacher development.

Co-Education/Co-Research Partnership: A Critical Approach to Co-Learning between Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative and Tufts University

Community-engaged pedagogy: a strengths-based approach to involving diverse stakeholders in research partnerships

Bronx Community Collaborative Opportunities for Research and Education: Implementation and Evaluation of a Community–Academic Partnership

Unfinishedness: Striving for a Viable Partnership Between TFA and Its University Partner

Collaborative partnerships in community education

Taking responsibility: Institutional agents of color (Re)imagine collaboration that centers community stakeholders in university-community partnerships

Inhabiting Each Other's Castles: towards knowledge and mutual growth through collaboration

Perspectives of Community Co-Researchers About Group Dynamics and Equitable Partnership Within a Community–Academic Research Team

Building Sustainable Organizational and Community Capacity for Research Partnerships: A Decade of Experience

EDUCATION AS THE POWER OF PARTNERSHIP: THE CONTEXT OF CO-LABOR-ATION

Creating a Culture of Empowerment in Research: Findings from a Capacity-Building Training Program

Students-as-Partners Versus Students-as-Employees: Division of Labour Between Students, Faculty, and Staff in the McMaster Student Partners Program

Breaking down the walls of the ‘Ivory Tower’: critical reflections on how co-teaching partnerships can bridge the gap between inclusive education theory and practice

A Critical-Relational Approach to Community Development That Increases Well-Being, Learning Outcomes and Retention of International Students

Laying a foundation for critical professional development through a research–practice partnership

The developmental stages of a community-university partnership: the experience of Padres Informados/Jovenes Preparados

Enhancing Capacity of Community–Academic Partnerships to Achieve Health Equity: Results From the CBPR Partnership Academy

Community Design Circles: Co-designing Justice and Wellbeing in Family-Community-Research Partnerships

The university/community partnership: transdisciplinary course development

Inclusive excellence through digital learning: an undergraduate research experience to pilot cross-institutional collaboration between a historically black university and a predominantly white institution

Community-Based Research with Immigrant Families: Sustaining an Intellectual Commons of Care, Resistance, and Solidarity in an Urban Intensive Context