Abstract:Ecological restoration policies and their implementation are influenced by ecological and socioeconomic drivers. Top-down approach-based spatial planning, emphasizing hierarchical control within government structures, and without a comprehensive consideration of social–ecological interactions may result in implementation failure and low efficiency. Although many researchers have indicated the necessity to engage social–ecological interactions between stakeholders in effective planning processes, socioeconomic drivers of ecological restoration on a large scale are difficult to quantify because of data scarcity and knowledge limitations. Here, we established a new ecological restoration planning approach linking a social–ecological system framework to large-scale ecological restoration planning. The new spatial planning approach integrates bottom-up approaches targeting stakeholder interests and provides social considerations for stakeholder behavior analysis. Based on this approach, a meta-analysis is introduced to recognize key socioeconomic and social–ecological factors influencing large-scale ecological restoration implementation, and a stochastic model is constructed to analyze the impact of socioeconomic drivers on the behavior of authorities and participants on a large scale. We used the Yangtze River Basin-based Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP), one of the largest payments for ecosystem service programs worldwide, to quantify the socioeconomic impacts of large-scale ecological restoration programs. Current CCFP planning without socioeconomic considerations failed to achieve large-scale program goals and showed low investment efficiency, with 19.71% of the implemented area reconverting to cropland after contract expiry. In contrast, spatial matching between planned and actual restoration increased from 61.55% to 81.86% when socioeconomic drivers were included. In addition, compared to that with the current CCFP implementation, the cost effectiveness of spatial planning with social considerations improved by 46.94%. Thus, spatial optimization planning that integrates both top-down and bottom-up approaches can result in more practical and effective ecological restoration than top-down approaches alone. Our new approach incorporates socioeconomic factors into large-scale ecological restoration planning with high practicality and efficiency.

Monitoring the social benefits of ecological restoration

Improving Restoration Programs Through Greater Connection With Ecological Theory and Better Monitoring

Quantifying the Reporting, Coverage and Consistency of Key Indicators in Mangrove Restoration Projects

How Social Considerations Improve the Equity and Effectiveness of Ecosystem Restoration

Evaluating Ecological Restoration Success: A Review of the Literature

Biogeomorphological response to river restoration of a suburban river with large wood: Creating a restoration vision and cost‐effectively monitoring the response trajectory using the citizen science MoRPh survey

Ecological success in stream restoration: case studies from the midwestern United States

Combining ecosystem services assessment with structured decision making to support ecological restoration planning

Does river restoration work? Taxonomic and functional trajectories at two restoration schemes

Planning for people and nature: Comparing quality‐of‐life outcomes across environmental systems to inform conservation planning

Soil health indicators for monitoring forest ecological restoration: a critical review

Consideration of spatial and temporal scales in stream restorations and biotic monitoring to assess restoration outcomes: A literature review, Part 2

Ecological restoration volunteers: the benefits of participation

Ecological restoration success from community and agency perspectives: exploring the differences

Identifying restoration hotspots that deliver multiple ecological benefits

Remote Sensing Application in Ecological Restoration Monitoring: A Systematic Review

Coordinative Enhancement of Ecological Security and the Aesthetic Viewing Service in the Ecological Restoration of Mining Landscapes

Integrating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches Improves Practicality and Efficiency of Large-Scale Ecological Restoration Planning: Insights from a Social–Ecological System

The Ecological Benefits of Positive Public Perception on Public Access Ecological Restorations

Monitoring and Effect Evaluation of an Ecological Restoration Project Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing: A Case Study of Wuliangsuhai Watershed in China

Monitoring forest structure to guide adaptive management of forest restoration: a review of remote sensing approaches