Endogenous Information Disclosure and Corporate Governance
Renhui Fu,Yong H. Kim,Buhui Qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1572784
2010-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:We empirically study the endogeneity nature of disclosure quality and the effect of the regulatory reform at the beginning of this century under the Hermalin and Weisback (2009) theoretical framework. Our sample period encompasses two subperiods - the pre-reform subperiod of 1992 to 1999 and the post-reform subperiod of 2004 to 2007. We rank our sample firms into ten deciles based on their cash flow uncertainty (volatility) in the first subperiod. We find that higher cash flow uncertainty deciles have higher accruals and discretionary accruals (proxies for disclosure quality). Moreover, post regulatory reform, only the high cash flow uncertainty deciles experience decline in accruals and discretionary accruals - the higher the uncertainty decile rank, the larger the decline (i.e., the reform appears to be binding on the high cash flow uncertainty deciles).We also document that, post regulatory reform, only the high cash flow uncertainty deciles experience decline in R&D and advertisement expenses (proxy for myopic managerial behaviors) - again, the higher the decile, the larger the decline. Similarly, only the high uncertainty deciles experience reduction in firm valuation (measured by Tobin’s Q) - the higher the uncertainty decile, the larger the reduction. In terms of executive compensation, post reform, higher uncertainty deciles experience a higher degree of increase in CEO compensation ratio (i.e., compensation as a fraction of sales). These results are generally consistent with the predictions of HW (2009).