Abstract:Background Data-driven decision making continues to be a common feature of educational reform agendas across the globe. In many U.S. schools, the teacher team meeting is a key setting in which data use is intended to take place, with the aim of planning instruction to address students’ needs. However, most prior research has not examined how the use of data shapes teachers’ dialogue about their students’ ability and achievement. Purpose This study examines how teachers talk about student ability and achievement in the era of data-driven decision making and how their talk is shaped by the use of data within teams, their school contexts, and broader accountability systems. Research Design The study draws on interview and observational data gathered from teacher teams in four elementary schools. In each of these schools, teachers were expected to use data to inform instructional differentiation. Data collection efforts involved regular visits to each school over the course of one year to interview teachers and conduct observations of teacher team meetings. In the process of analysis, interview transcripts and field notes were coded, and themes were extracted within and across codes. Findings Across schools, teachers used common labels (e.g., “low,” “middle,” “GATE”) to describe students of different achievement levels and the programs they were involved in. The use of labels and student categories was relational and comparative and influenced by the accountability and policy contexts in which teachers worked. At the same time, regular meetings in which teachers jointly examined data on student learning provided a space for teachers to examine students’ strengths and weaknesses on a variety of measures and talk in terms of student growth. Teachers questioned whether assessment data provided an accurate picture of student achievement and acknowledged the role of student effort, behavior, and family circumstances as important factors that were not easily measured. These discussions opened up deeper inquiry into the factors that supported or hindered student learning. The implementation of the Common Core State Standards also led some teachers to question prior categorizations of student ability. Conclusions/Recommendations The findings from this study suggest that educational reforms and policies regarding data use influence educators’ conceptions of student achievement and ability. On the one hand, accountability policies can narrow the dialogue about students. On the other hand, educational reforms and policies could also lead to new ways of thinking about student learning and to an examination of a broader range of data, and provide opportunities for professional learning.

Datafied at four: the role of data in the ‘schoolification’ of early childhood education in England

“It’s Like How Mom Cooks for You, Tell Her Nothing You Only Get Chicken Soup.”: Understanding Children’s Perception of Datafication Online in China

Setting by numbers: datafication processes and ability grouping in an English secondary school

Datafication of schooling in Japan: an epistemic critique through the ‘problem of Japanese education’

(Un)teaching the ‘datafied student subject’: perspectives from an education-based masters in an English university

Educators’ understandings of digital classroom tools and datafication: perceptions from higher education faculty

The datafication of teaching in Higher Education: critical issues and perspectives

Structural Factors and Policy Change as Related to the Quality of Early Childhood Education and Care for 3–4 Year Olds in the UK

‘Slimmed down’ assessment or increased accountability? Teachers, elections and UK government assessment policy

Data and privacy literacy: the role of the school in educating children in a datafied society

Early Childhood Education Participation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Parent and Provider Perceived Barriers and Facilitators

Learning to live well with data

Understanding how early childhood educators ‘see’ learning through digitally cast eyes: Some preliminary concepts concerning the use of digital documentation platforms

Doing Assessment: A Multicase Study of Preschool Teachers’ Language and Literacy Data Practices

Teacher Talk about Student Ability and Achievement in the Era of Data-Driven Decision Making

Making little neo-liberals: The production of ideal child/learner subjectivities in primary school through choice, self-improvement and ‘growth mindsets’

Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’ to support future practices in faculty development: a systematic review of the literature

The datafication of higher education: examining universities’ conceptions and articulations of ‘teaching quality’

The role of digital technologies in supporting quality improvement in Australian early childhood education and care settings

Early childhood practitioner beliefs about digital media: integrating technology into a child-centred classroom environment

Educators' data literacy