Three pillars of sustainability in fisheries

Frank Asche,Taryn M. Garlock,James L. Anderson,Simon R. Bush,Martin D. Smith,Christopher M. Anderson,Jingjie Chu,Karen A. Garrett,Audun Lem,Kai Lorenzen,Atle Oglend,Sigbjørn Tveteras,Stefania Vannuccini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807677115
IF: 11.1
2018-09-24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance The United Nations proclaims that sustainable development comprises environmental, economic, and social sustainability. Fisheries contribute to livelihoods, food security, and human health worldwide; however, as the planet’s last major hunting and gathering industry, whether, and if so, how fishing can achieve all three pillars of sustainability is unclear. The relationships between environmental and economic sustainability, as well as between economic and social sustainability, continue to receive attention. We analyzed data from 121 fisheries worldwide to evaluate potential trade-offs. We found no evidence of trade-offs, and instead found that environmental, economic, and social objectives are complementary when fisheries are managed. Our results challenge the idea that the three pillars of sustainability are in conflict, suggesting that rights-based systems can be designed to support all three pillars.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?