Subcutaneous Infliximab (CT-P13 SC) as Maintenance Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Two Randomized Phase 3 Trials (LIBERTY)
Stephen B Hanauer,Bruce E Sands,Stefan Schreiber,Silvio Danese,Maria Kłopocka,Jarosław Kierkuś,Roman Kulynych,Maciej Gonciarz,Artur Sołtysiak,Patryk Smoliński,Slobodan Srećković,Ekaterina Valuyskikh,Adi Lahat,Marek Horyński,Antonio Gasbarrini,Marina Osipenko,Vladimir Borzan,Maciej Kowalski,Daria Saenko,Ruslan Sardinov,Sang Joon Lee,Sunghyun Kim,Yunju Bae,Sunhee Lee,Seulgi Lee,Joon Ho Lee,Siyoung Yang,Jimin Lee,Juhyun Lee,Jong Min Kim,Gahee Park,William J Sandborn,Jean-Frederic Colombel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.05.006
IF: 29.4
2024-05-23
Gastroenterology
Abstract:Background & aims: CT-P13 subcutaneous (SC), an SC formulation of the intravenous (IV) infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 IV, creates a unique exposure profile. The LIBERTY studies aimed to demonstrate superiority of CT-P13 SC vs placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: Two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies were conducted in patients with moderately to severely active CD or UC and inadequate response or intolerance to corticosteroids and immunomodulators. All patients received open-label CT-P13 IV 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6. At week 10, clinical responders were randomized (2:1) to CT-P13 SC 120 mg or placebo every 2 weeks until week 54 (maintenance phase) using prefilled syringes. (Co-) primary end points were clinical remission and endoscopic response (CD) and clinical remission (UC) at week 54 (all-randomized population). Results: Overall, 396 patients with CD and 548 patients with UC received induction treatment. At week 54 in the CD study, statistically significant higher proportions of CT-P13 SC-treated patients vs placebo-treated patients achieved clinical remission (62.3% vs 32.1%; P < .0001) and endoscopic response (51.1% vs 17.9%; P < .0001). In the UC study, clinical remission rates at week 54 were statistically significantly higher with CT-P13 SC vs placebo (43.2% vs 20.8%; P < .0001). Achievement of key secondary end points was significantly higher with CT-P13 SC vs placebo across both studies. CT-P13 SC was well tolerated, with no new safety signals identified. Conclusions: CT-P13 SC was more effective than placebo as maintenance therapy and was well tolerated in patients with moderately to severely active CD or UC who responded to CT-P13 IV induction. Clinicaltrials: gov, Numbers: NCT03945019 (CD) and NCT04205643 (UC).