Abstract:Rust is a programming language that combines memory safety and low-level control, providing C-like performance while guaranteeing the absence of undefined behaviors by default. Rust's growing popularity has prompted research on safe and correct transpiling of existing code-bases to Rust. Existing work falls into two categories: rule-based and large language model (LLM)-based. While rule-based approaches can theoretically produce correct transpilations that maintain input-output equivalence to the original, they often yield unreadable Rust code that uses unsafe subsets of the Rust language. On the other hand, while LLM-based approaches typically produce more readable, maintainable, and safe code, they do not provide any guarantees about correctness. In this work, we present VERT, a tool that can produce readable Rust transpilations with formal guarantees of correctness. VERT's only requirement is that there is Web Assembly compiler for the source language, which is true for most major languages. VERT first uses the Web Assembly compiler to obtain an oracle Rust program. In parallel, VERT uses an LLM to generate a readable candidate Rust program. This candidate is verified against the oracle, and if verification fails, we regenerate a new candidate transpilation until verification succeeds. We evaluate VERT by transpiling a suite of 1,394 programs taken from competitive programming style benchmarks. Combining Anthropic's Claude-2 and VERT increases Rust transpilations passing property-based testing from 31% to 54% and bounded model-checking from 1% to 42% compared to using Claude alone. In addition, we evaluate VERT's ability to generate non-trivial safe Rust on programs taken from real-world C projects that make significant use of pointers. Our results provide insights into the limitations of LLMs to write safe Rust.

Verifying Rust Programs with SMACK

Surveying the Rust Verification Landscape

A hybrid approach to semi-automated Rust verification

Understanding and Detecting Real-World Safety Issues in Rust

Crux, a Precise Verifier for Rust and Other Languages

VERT: Verified Equivalent Rust Transpilation with Large Language Models as Few-Shot Learners

Refinement Proofs in Rust Using Ghost Locks

Understanding Memory and Thread Safety Practices and Issues in Real-World Rust Programs

KRust: A Formal Executable Semantics of Rust

RustHorn: CHC-based Verification for Rust Programs (full version)

Reasoning about Interior Mutability in Rust using Library-Defined Capabilities

Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Proof Synthesis in Rust

Automated Proof Generation for Rust Code via Self-Evolution

Verification of a Rust Implementation of Knuth's Dancing Links using ACL2

A Mixed-Methods Study on the Implications of Unsafe Rust for Interoperation, Encapsulation, and Tooling

Memory-Safety Challenge Considered Solved? An In-Depth Study with All Rust CVEs

Is Rust Used Safely by Software Developers?

Rust for Embedded Systems: Current State, Challenges and Open Problems

An Analysis of the Rust Programming Practice for Memory Safety Assurance.

Rust for Embedded Systems: Current State, Challenges and Open Problems (Extended Report)

Modularity, Code Specialization, and Zero-Cost Abstractions for Program Verification