Finding and fixing food system emissions: the double helix of science and policy
Cynthia Rosenzweig,Francesco N Tubiello,David Sandalow,Philippe Benoit,Matthew N Hayek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0134
IF: 6.7
2021-06-01
Environmental Research Letters
Abstract:Improving estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from food production, supply, consumption, and disposal is fundamental to identifying effective policy solutions. Through broader awareness of the food-climate nexus, climate mitigation as well as resilience can be enhanced. However, work is needed to address knowledge gaps, promote better policies and improve public understanding of issues related to the food system and climate change. The intention of this paper is not only to highlight the need for better scientific understanding of the processes through which GHGs are emitted—from production to processing, from supply chains and retail to food preparation and waste (figure <a href="#erlac0134f1">1</a>)—but also to integrate science and policy in order to scale up impact on climate change action.<strong>Figure 1.</strong> GHG emissions sources in the food system. Reproduced from The Noun Project. <a class="webref" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">CC BY 3.0</a>. From top-left to bottom-right: Fertilizer by Syaiful Amri,Tractor by Olivier, Forest by Nesdon Booth, Wetland by Iconathon, Moss by Laymik, Thick Grass by Hamish, Savanna by Hamish, Farming by ProSymbols, Cow by Alexandr Lavreniuk, Boat by Amethyst Studio, Aquaculutre by Angelo Troiano, Grains Silo by Ben Davis, GMO by Stephanie Wauters, Food Conatiner by dDara, Tranport by Prianka, Temperature by Andrejs Kirma, Cooking by Erik Arndt, Grocery by Iconixar, Fast Food by Kristina Margaryan, School Building by Siipkan Collective, Waste by Priyanka, Compostable by Luca Reghellin, Excavator on Landfill by Peter van Drie, Waste water by Mavadee, Incineration by Eucalyp.Download figure:Beyond calculating the emissions from fertilizer decomposition in the soil (e.g. Muhammad <em>et al</em><a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib15">2011</a>), from converting forests to pastures (e.g. Han and Zhu <a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib10">2020</a>), from diesel combustion in tractors and fishing boats (e.g. Tomić <em>et al</em><a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib19">2013</a>, Ziegler <em>et al</em><a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib24">2013</a>), and from cows and other ruminants (e.g. Herrero <em>et al</em><a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib13">2013</a>), we need to cast a broader yet tighter net (see, e.g. Crippa <em>et al</em><a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib5">2021</a>) to better identify the myriad ways in which the food system generates emissions. For example, much of the work to address the impact of the food system on climate change globally has focused on crops and livestock, with less attention paid to aquaculture and fisheries and associated value chains.In addition, a significant portion of total global energy consumption is for food (FAO <a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib8">2011</a>). Energy use occurs throughout the food system, including in fertilizer manufacturing, food packaging and food preparation for consumption (i.e. cooking itself). Socioeconomic systems, political systems, and human dynamics are also crucial, including demographics, economics, behavior, culture, policy, and institutions. Further, this broader food system perspective can provide a useful framework for developing solutions aimed at achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (Pradhan <em>et al</em><a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib17">2017</a>).Food-related GHG emissions are traditionally reported by Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines (Calvo Buendia <em>et al</em><a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib4">2019</a>). These guidelines embed food system emissions in multiple inventory categories, such as agriculture, transport, industry, waste, and energy, irrespective of fundamental connections between food supply and demand dynamics (Poore and Nemecek <a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib16">2018</a>). However, climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies associated with the food system are likely to be inefficient and possibly counterproductive unless food-related emissions from these various sectors are conceptualized as a unified whole (Rosenzweig <em>et al</em><a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib18">2020</a>). Complementing the supply analysis with the demand side of the food system, for instance through changes in dietary choices, can lead to overall GHG emission reductions (Mbow <em>et al</em><a class="cite" href="#erlac0134bib14">2019</a>).Science and policy domains have often been siloed in academia. We suggest that a 'double helix' of interactive research by scientists and policy experts can deliver significant benefits when analyzing potential food system solutions to climate change. Such deliberate interactions can help to accelerate the transformation needed to reduce the significant share of GHG emissions arising from the food system. The combined technical and policy soluti <p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences