Climate-related risks to central bank independence: the depoliticisation and repoliticisation of the Bank of England in the transition to net zero
James Jackson Daniel Bailey Matthew Paterson a Sustainable Consumption Institute & Department of Politics,University of Manchester,Manchester,UKb Department of Finance and Economics,Manchester Metropolitan University,Manchester,UKJames Jackson is a Hallsworth Research Fellow at the Sustainable Consumption Institute (SCI) and Department of Politics at the University of Manchester,United Kingdom. His research is focused on the political economy of climate change,particularly the intersection of fiscal,monetary,and climate policy.Dan Bailey is a Senior Lecturer in International Political Economy at Manchester Metropolitan University. His research focuses on the between the global economy,ecological degradation,and political institutions.Matthew Paterson is a Professor of International Politics and Director of the Sustainable Consumption Institute (SCI) at The University of Manchester,United Kingdom. His research focuses on environmental politics,especially climate change politics,examining the challenges that dramatic environmental change poses to existing political institutions and structures,and what drives the responses of those systems to the unsustainability of the current world order. His book 'In Search of Climate Politics' was published in Cambridge University Press in 2021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2024.2434931
IF: 3.625
2024-12-08
New Political Economy
Abstract:Faced with ever-growing climate-related financial risks, the role of central banks in climate governance has intensified debates surrounding central bank independence (CBI). Informed by elite interviews with UK monetary policy experts and a discourse analysis of Bank of England reports, this article reveals the internal views on repoliticisation of the Bank and CBI catalysed by the mandate to 'facilitate the transition to net zero'. We find different interpretations of CBI that are shaped by perceptions of the Bank's existing political status, with some claiming that the Bank is intrinsically apolitical and immune to repoliticisation and others viewing CBI as fragile or a strategically-deployed discourse. Across three distinct views of politics, and by extensions CBI, we identify dual dynamics of depoliticisation and re-politicisation that serve to legitimate and depoliticise prior mission creep whilst simultaneously licencing politicising debates on the bank's institutional evolution. We demonstrate that the Bank of England is an indispensable case study in the green central banking literature for understanding the political economy of CBI within the context of climate change.
economics,international relations,political science