Abstract:Cooperation in social dilemmas plays a pivotal role in the formation of systems at all levels of complexity, from replicating molecules to multi-cellular organisms to human and animal societies. In spite of its ubiquity, the origin and stability of cooperation pose an evolutionary conundrum, since cooperation, though beneficial to others, is costly to the individual cooperator. Thus natural selection would be expected to favor selfish behavior in which individuals reap the benefits of cooperation without bearing the costs of cooperating themselves. Many proximate mechanisms have been proposed to account for the origin and maintenance of cooperation, including kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, and evolution in structured populations. Despite the apparent diversity of these approaches they all share a unified underlying logic: namely, each mechanism results in assortative interactions in which individuals using the same strategy interact with a higher probability than they would at random. Here we study the evolution of cooperation in both discrete strategy and continuous strategy social dilemmas with assortative interactions. For the sake of tractability, assortativity is modeled by an individual interacting with another of the same type with probability r and interacting with a random individual in the population with probability 1−r, where r is a parameter that characterizes the degree of assortativity in the system. For discrete strategy social dilemmas we use both a generalization of replicator dynamics and individual-based simulations to elucidate the donation, snowdrift, and sculling games with assortative interactions, and determine the analogs of Hamilton’s rule, which govern the evolution of cooperation in these games. For continuous strategy social dilemmas we employ both a generalization of deterministic adaptive dynamics and individual-based simulations to study the donation, snowdrift, and tragedy of the commons games, and determine the effect of assortativity on the emergence and stability of cooperation.

Scaling the phase-planes of social dilemma strengths shows game-class changes in the five rules governing the evolution of cooperation

Evolutionary Dynamics Drives Role Specialization in a Community of Players

Dynamic utility: the sixth reciprocity mechanism for the evolution of cooperation

Coevolutionary Dynamics of Collective Cooperation and Dilemma Strength in a Collective-Risk Game

The persistence-based game transition resolves the social dilemma

Wisdom of groups promotes cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas

Resolving social dilemmas with minimal reward transfer

Relationships between dilemma strength and fixation properties in coevolutionary games

Evolution of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with Assortative Interactions

Evolution of conditional cooperation in collective-risk social dilemma with repeated group interactions

The collapse of cooperation in evolving games

Nash equilibrium mapping vs Hamiltonian dynamics vs Darwinian evolution for some social dilemma games in the thermodynamic limit

The evolution of cooperation in public goods games on the scale-free community network under multiple strategy-updating rules

Cooperation and competition between pair and multi-player social games in spatial populations

An Application of Evolutionary Game Theory to Social Dilemmas: The Traveler's Dilemma and the Minimum Effort Coordination Game

The rules of multiplayer cooperation in networks of communities

Coevolutionary dynamics via adaptive feedback in collective-risk social dilemma game

Universal Effect of Dynamical Reinforcement Learning Mechanism in Spatial Evolutionary Games

The guidance of neutral human populations maintains cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game

The implications of deep cooperation strategy for the evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas