Abstract:The designation of handicrafts as “intangible heritage” under South Korea’s Intangible Cultural Properties Protection Law contains an inherent contradiction: The skills of potters, weavers, paper-makers and other craft producers are akin to the embodied and artful work of dancers and singers in performance genres similarly recognized by the law, and they are likewise realized through disciplined and embodied knowledge made manifest in evanescent performance—thus their “intangibility.” But in contrast with performing arts, handicraft production leaves its tangible trace in a material object, in such things as cast metal, worked wood, ceramics, and textiles. In other words, the resulting craft object is a witness to the performance of intangible heritage and thus to the validity of the object’s claims as an authentic and valuable Korean thing. Market value makes possible the viability of the craft, but marketable crafts also assume innovations and compromises to meet consumer tastes with a viable price point. In this article, I explore the ambiguities of handicraft performance, how certain aspects become front stage and iconic demonstrations while others are carried out backstage, how claims are made for the Koreanness of the performers, and how some processes and materials are necessarily compromised in the practical production of handicrafts for a high end market. It is not my aim to argue against a compromised authenticity but rather to situate the story of Korean handicraft inside an ongoing discussion about what it means to do handicraft in the broadest possible sense in the twenty-first century. The verb “to do” is carefully chosen to include not only the critical process of making things in the sense of throwing pots or looming cloth but the surrounding networks of material acquisition, labor, circulation, marketing, consumption, and general discursive “craft talk.”

Re-Evaluating the ‘craft as design’ Discourse Embraced in the Field of Israeli Ceramics

Reprising Craftsmanship

The Ethical Pondering Upon Design

Design activism and the favorable conditions for craft engagement Bière de la Rade case study

INTANGIBLE TRACES AND MATERIAL THINGS: THE PERFORMANCE OF HERITAGE HANDICRAFT

Crafting Critical Heritage Discourses into Interactive Exhibition Design

Design and craftsmanship: an analysis of the role of designers in transforming artisanal practices

Design through making: crafts knowledge as facilitator to collaborative new product development

The role of craft in creative innovation: skin, cloth and metal

An Analytical study to develop the traditional craft in the field of creative industries in Egypt

Craft as Leverage for Sustainable Design Transformation: A Theoretical Foundation

Analysis on Emotional Design of Daily Ceramic Products

Exploration of Civic Teaching of Architectural Design Foundation Based on Craftsmanship

Safi Ceramics: Designing Future Heritage

Research on Cultural Creative Product Design Based on Traditional Ceramic Craft

Craft as Critique in Experimental Animation

Research on the Role of Art Creation in Ceramic Material Product Design Based on the Perspective of Innovation

Dogma Film and Ceramic art: The Case of ‘Blue Collar – White Collar’

Identity Navigation and Self-Positioning in a Changing Craft World: Creativity and Cultures of Emerging Self-Employed Craft Workers in Jingdezhen

Design Culture and Dialogic Design

A Nourishing Dialogue with the Material Environment