Foams to Control Slugging Issues in Pipeline - From Lab to Simulation

Ivy Chai Ching Hsia,Bishop Falope,Nor Hadhirah Halim,M Azmeer Rodzali
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22235-ms
2022-02-21
Abstract:Abstract Hydrodynamic slugging or two-phase liquid-gas flow instability in pipeline has caused loss in flow capacity and intense vibration at the separator leading to integrity issues. This issue can be resolve using foams generated from surfactants which are introduced into the pipeline to entrap and slow down gas flow, thus enhance its mixing with liquids. To understand how the behaviour or foams in a pipeline impact or alleviate slugging performances, the foams behaviour in the pipeline was simulated using OLGA. First, two main parameters i.e. foams viscosity and interfacial tension in the presence of crude oil were obtained from precision lab experiments. Using a foam rheometer, foam viscosity with crude oil was measured under actual pipeline conditions. Surfactant and crude oil were injected into the rheometer until 500 psi was reached. Then, gas was injected into the loop at a given foam quality (fg). Foam quality, or the gas-liquid ratio was sensitized to 40- and 50% (e.g. fg=40 is 40% gas volume of the total fluids). Shear rates of 100 to 1000 s-1 were applied, and foam viscosities were recorded. For interfacial tension test, the pendant drop method was used. A drop of aged emulsion was drop into a continuous phase of nitrogen gas. The interfacial tension values were assumed as gas-water (without and with surfactant) and gas-oil, at 90:10 water:crude oil cut as per field condition. In the model, first the baseline of the hydrodynamic slugging behaviour was established and simulated using actual pipeline dimension, gas and liquid flow rates, and actual fluids properties, which showed obvious liquid fluctuations. The simulation established at which viscosity and interfacial tension values would have an impact in alleviating slugging by interpreting the output QLT - total liquid volume flow (bbl/d). Foam viscosity for both fg=40 and 50 showed shear thinning behaviour i.e. as shear rate increases, viscosity falls as accordance to the power law. In the model, viscosity as low as 2.5 cP (at 1000 s-1, fg=40) showed reduction in liquid fluctuations as read from the QLT arriving at the inlet of the pipeline, compared to baseline without foam viscosity input. Liquid fluctuations were reduced by 97% just from viscosity change due to presence of foam. Interfacial tension input at 0.024 and 0.021 mN/m for gas-brine and gas-oil, respectively in the presence of surfactant was able to reduce the number of QLT spikes by 24%. By combining the inputs of both parameters, a reduction of QLT or liquid fluctuations by a total of 97% was recorded. This study showed that foams were able to slow down gas velocity and reduced liquid fluctuations thus reducing slugging in one of the problematic pipelines in Malaysia. Accurate foam viscosity measurements generated from the lab remains a vital input to the model - so as to understand behaviour of foam and quantify its impact before actual field applications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?