Abstract:Creativity has long been thought as the ability to produce original,novel,flexible,and useful ideas that are free from established mental habit.It is considered as an aspect of the fully functioning personality.However,the existence of a relationship between "creativity" and unusual mental states has been speculated on for centuries.Highly creative people have demonstrated elevated risk for certain forms of psychopathology,especially mood disorders and schizophrenia spectrum disorders.Empirically examining the connection between creativity and psychopathology,and then exploring the nature as well as the cognitive and neural mechanisms of creativity are currently hot research topics.However,within the scientific domain,previous literature reviews came to quite different conclusions.Based on evidence from the behavioral,neuroimaging and genetics studies,we first review and comment on empirical researches and principal theoretical viewpoints on the connection between creativity and psychopathology,and then explore systematically the inner relationship between creativity and psychopathology.These results provide support for the notion that creativity and psychiatric disorders,particularly schizophrenia and bipolar disorder,share psychological attributes.However,whether and to what degree this is due to shared environment or genetics has not been assessed and the exact relationship between creativity and psychopathology is still a contentious issue.The main challenge in supporting this claim is that the statement itself is very general.In addition,there are a number of issues that contribute to unclarity within this literature.One issue is the way in which "creativity" and "mental illness" are discussed.Another issue that contributes to confusion in the field is the use of various "creativity measures" that measure different facets of creativity across studies.To foster examination of potential relationships between creativity and mental illness,it would be prudent to use a more systematic approach in which these constructs are made explicit in each study.Using multiple creativity measures in one study would provide data for convergent and discriminant validity between the facets of creativity measured in that study.Examining one facet of creativity in more than one mental illness or symptom type within one study could assist in determining specificity of that facet to a particular symptom type.The use of more sophisticated statistics that test the possibility of other types of associations between these constructs would allow better testing of more complex relationships.Future studies should strengthen theory integration and construction in the relation between creativity and psychopathology,use imaging genetics and big data,and carry out multi-faceted and multi-disciplinary research at the microcosmic,meso and macro levels as well as under the framework of "Genes-Brain-Environment-Behavior".In bringing these different perspectives together in one common forum,the hope is that this collective effort at addressing this intriguing question will lead to further constructive dialogue and debate in the scientific arena by adding more substance and rigor to discussions of the association between creativity and psychopathology.Meanwhile,we should improve more multicenter research on subclinical groups in a larger sample size,and longitudinal research designs should be encouraged.Such a research approach will be conducive to explore the inner relationship between creativity and psychopathology as well as its influencing factors and underlying biological mechanisms.If this more detailed approach is used to engage this question more systematically,we may finally be able to put this ageold broad question to rest and instead ask more targeted ones.

The Neural Mechanism Underlying Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Creativity

Non-cognitive Factors' Effect on Individual Creativity

Good or Bad for Ambivalent Emotion on Creativity? A Moderated Mediation Model

Moral Emotion: A New Perspective on the Relationship Between Morality and Creativity

Is Ambivalent Emotion Good or Bad for Creativity? A Moderated Mediation Model of the New Construct of Emotional Stability

Neural, genetic, and cognitive signatures of creativity

A Unified Framework of the "Genes-Brain-environment-behavior" for the Relation Between Creativity and Psychopathology

Network Connectivity Of The Creative Brain: Current Knowledge And Future Directions

[Neuroscience of creativity or can the ungraspable be captured?]

Emotional Intent Modulates The Neural Substrates Of Creativity: An fMRI Study of Emotionally Targeted Improvisation in Jazz Musicians

Neural and genetic determinants of creativity

A neurocomputational model of creative processes

Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling of Creativity Anxiety

Creativity and Perception: Unveiling the Role of Cross‐Modal Audiovisual Integration

Relations of Creativity to the Interplay Between High-order Cognitive Functions: Behavioral and Neural Evidence

Semantic associative abilities and executive control functions predict novelty and appropriateness of idea generation

When the Mood Hits Your Eye: Interactive Effects of Cognition and Affect on Creativity

The Influence of Varying Positive Affect in Approach-Motivation Intensity on Creative Idea Generation and Creative Idea Evaluation: an Fnirs Study

The Relationship Between Epistemic Curiosity and Creativity: Research Status and Educational Implications

The Interplay between Negative Activating Emotions, Family Expressiveness, and Gender: Implications for Creativity

Amygdala-frontoparietal effective connectivity in creativity and humor processing