Pesticide affects social behavior of bees

Nigel E Raine,Nigel E. Raine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav5273

IF: 56.9

2018-11-09

Science

Abstract:Neonicotinoid exposure impairs the social dynamics of bumblebees inside the nest

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Pesticides and pollinator brain: How do neonicotinoids affect the central nervous system of bees?

Marco Paoli,Martin Giurfa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16536

IF: 3.698

2024-09-12

European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract:Neurobiological analyses at the level of the central nervous system are necessary to uncover the real impact of pesticides on pollinators. Neonicotinoids affect the bee nervous system in a significant way, even at and sublethal and field‐relevant doses; they disrupt olfactory processing at multiple levels in the bee brain and affect neural development across generations. Environmental policies should integrate neuroscientific information for establishing rational uses of pesticides. Neonicotinoids represent over a quarter of the global pesticide market. Research on their environmental impact has revealed their adverse effect on the cognitive functions of pollinators, in particular of bees. Cognitive impairments, mostly revealed by behavioural studies, are the phenotypic expression of an alteration in the underlying neural circuits, a matter deserving greater attention. Here, we reviewed studies on the impact of field‐relevant doses of neonicotinoids on the neurophysiology and neurodevelopment of bees. In particular, we focus on their olfactory system as much knowledge has been gained on the different brain areas that participate in odour processing. Recent studies have revealed the detrimental effects of neonicotinoids at multiple levels of the olfactory system, including modulation of odorant‐induced activity in olfactory sensory neurons, diminished neural responses in the antennal lobe (the first olfactory processing centre) and abnormal development of the neural connectivity within the mushroom bodies (central neuropils involved in multisensory integration, learning and memory storage, among others). Given the importance of olfactory perception for multiple aspects of bee biology, the reported disruption of the olfactory circuit, which can occur even upon exposure to sublethal doses of neonicotinoids, has severe consequences at both individual and colony levels. Moreover, the effects reported for a multimodal structure such as the mushroom bodies indicate that neonicotinoids' impact translates to other sensory domains. Assessing the impact of field‐relevant doses of pesticides on bee neurophysiology is crucial for understanding how neonicotinoids influence their behaviour in ecological contexts and for defining effective and sustainable agricultural practices.

neurosciences
Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees

B A Woodcock,J M Bullock,R F Shore,M S Heard,M G Pereira,J Redhead,L Ridding,H Dean,D Sleep,P Henrys,J Peyton,S Hulmes,L Hulmes,M Sárospataki,C Saure,M Edwards,E Genersch,S Knäbe,R F Pywell,B. A. Woodcock,J. M. Bullock,R. F. Shore,M. S. Heard,M. G. Pereira,J. Redhead,L. Ridding,H. Dean,D. Sleep,P. Henrys,J. Peyton,S. Hulmes,L. Hulmes,M. Sárospataki,C. Saure,M. Edwards,E. Genersch,S. Knäbe,R. F. Pywell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1190

IF: 56.9

2017-06-30

Science

Abstract:Damage confirmed Early studies of the impacts of neonicotinoid insecticides on insect pollinators indicated considerable harm. However, lingering criticism was that the studies did not represent field-realistic levels of the chemicals or prevailing environmental conditions. Two studies, conducted on different crops and on two continents, now substantiate that neonicotinoids diminish bee health (see the Perspective by Kerr). Tsvetkov et al. find that bees near corn crops are exposed to neonicotinoids for 3 to 4 months via nontarget pollen, resulting in decreased survival and immune responses, especially when coexposed to a commonly used agrochemical fungicide. Woodcock et al. , in a multicounty experiment on rapeseed in Europe, find that neonicotinoid exposure from several nontarget sources reduces overwintering success and colony reproduction in both honeybees and wild bees. These field results confirm that neonicotinoids negatively affect pollinator health under realistic agricultural conditions. Science , this issue p. 1395 , p. 1393 ; see also p. 1331

multidisciplinary sciences
Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment

Tjeerd Blacquière,Guy Smagghe,Cornelis A M van Gestel,Veerle Mommaerts

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-012-0863-x

Ecotoxicology

Abstract:Neonicotinoid insecticides are successfully applied to control pests in a variety of agricultural crops; however, they may not only affect pest insects but also non-target organisms such as pollinators. This review summarizes, for the first time, 15 years of research on the hazards of neonicotinoids to bees including honey bees, bumble bees and solitary bees. The focus of the paper is on three different key aspects determining the risks of neonicotinoid field concentrations for bee populations: (1) the environmental neonicotinoid residue levels in plants, bees and bee products in relation to pesticide application, (2) the reported side-effects with special attention for sublethal effects, and (3) the usefulness for the evaluation of neonicotinoids of an already existing risk assessment scheme for systemic compounds. Although environmental residue levels of neonicotinoids were found to be lower than acute/chronic toxicity levels, there is still a lack of reliable data as most analyses were conducted near the detection limit and for only few crops. Many laboratory studies described lethal and sublethal effects of neonicotinoids on the foraging behavior, and learning and memory abilities of bees, while no effects were observed in field studies at field-realistic dosages. The proposed risk assessment scheme for systemic compounds was shown to be applicable to assess the risk for side-effects of neonicotinoids as it considers the effect on different life stages and different levels of biological organization (organism versus colony). Future research studies should be conducted with field-realistic concentrations, relevant exposure and evaluation durations. Molecular markers may be used to improve risk assessment by a better understanding of the mode of action (interaction with receptors) of neonicotinoids in bees leading to the identification of environmentally safer compounds.
A neonicotinoid pesticide causes tissue-specific gene expression changes in bumble bees

Alicja Witwicka,Federico Lopez-Osorio,Hannah Chaudhry-Phipps,Yannick Wurm

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.09.612896

2024-10-12

Abstract:Pesticides often harm beneficial insect pollinators, impairing their ability to navigate the environment, learn, fight off disease, and reproduce. Understanding the mechanisms behind these disorders is essential for improving pesticide risk assessments. To test whether pesticide exposure induces similar or distinct transcriptional responses across tissues, we administered field-realistic dose of the common neonicotinoid clothianidin to Bombus terrestris bumble bees. We then measured gene expression in brains, hind femurs, and Malpighian tubules. Our analyses revealed that 82% of gene expression differences were tissue-specific. Although genes associated with energy metabolism were consistently down-regulated across all tissues, pesticide exposure primarily affected core tissue functions, namely genes linked to ion transport in the brain, muscle function in the hind femur, and detoxification in Malpighian tubules. Furthermore, while the brain holds the highest abundance of pesticide target receptors, other tissues showed more substantial differences in gene expression magnitude. These findings reveal that pesticide exposure causes complex, tissue-specific effects rather than a uniform body-wide response. Our study provides a mechanistic basis for the severe effects of pesticide exposure on bees and shows how transcriptomics can help pinpoint the most affected areas and processes across the body. Accordingly focusing toxicological assays could significantly improve the precision of pesticide safety evaluations.

Ecology
Neonicotinoids disrupt circadian rhythms and sleep in honey bees

Michael C Tackenberg,Manuel A Giannoni-Guzmán,Erik Sanchez-Perez,Caleb A Doll,José L Agosto-Rivera,Kendal Broadie,Darrell Moore,Douglas G McMahon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72041-3

2020-10-21

Abstract:Honey bees are critical pollinators in ecosystems and agriculture, but their numbers have significantly declined. Declines in pollinator populations are thought to be due to multiple factors including habitat loss, climate change, increased vulnerability to disease and parasites, and pesticide use. Neonicotinoid pesticides are agonists of insect nicotinic cholinergic receptors, and sub-lethal exposures are linked to reduced honey bee hive survival. Honey bees are highly dependent on circadian clocks to regulate critical behaviors, such as foraging orientation and navigation, time-memory for food sources, sleep, and learning/memory processes. Because circadian clock neurons in insects receive light input through cholinergic signaling we tested for effects of neonicotinoids on honey bee circadian rhythms and sleep. Neonicotinoid ingestion by feeding over several days results in neonicotinoid accumulation in the bee brain, disrupts circadian rhythmicity in many individual bees, shifts the timing of behavioral circadian rhythms in bees that remain rhythmic, and impairs sleep. Neonicotinoids and light input act synergistically to disrupt bee circadian behavior, and neonicotinoids directly stimulate wake-promoting clock neurons in the fruit fly brain. Neonicotinoids disrupt honey bee circadian rhythms and sleep, likely by aberrant stimulation of clock neurons, to potentially impair honey bee navigation, time-memory, and social communication.
Impact of Chronic Exposure to Two Neonicotinoids on Honey Bee Antennal Responses to Flower Volatiles and Pheromonal Compounds

Riccardo Favaro,Jacob Roved,Albrecht Haase,Sergio Angeli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2022.821145

2022-04-18

Frontiers in Insect Science

Abstract:Volatile compounds provide important olfactory cues for honey bees ( Apis mellifera L.), which are essential for their ecology, behavior, and social communication. In the external environment bees locate food sources by the use of floral scents, while inside the hive, pheromones such as the queen mandibular pheromone (QMP) and alarm pheromones serve important functions in regulating colony life and inducing aggressive responses against intruders and parasites. Widely reported alterations of various behaviors in- and outside the hive following exposure to pesticides could therefore be associated with a disturbance of odor sensitivity. In the present study, we tested the effects of neonicotinoid pesticides at field concentrations on the ability of honey bees to perceive volatiles at the very periphery of the olfactory system. Bee colonies were subjected to treatments during the summer with either Imidacloprid or Thiacloprid at sublethal concentrations. Antennal responses to apple ( Malus domestica L.) flower volatiles were studied by GC-coupled electro-antennographic detection (GC-EAD), and a range of volatiles, a substitute of the QMP, and the alarm pheromone 2-heptanone were tested by electroantennography (EAG). Short-term and long-term effects of the neonicotinoid treatments were investigated on bees collected in the autumn and again in the following spring. Treatment with Thiacloprid induced changes in antennal responses to specific flower VOCs, with differing short- and long-term effects. In the short term, increased antennal responses were observed for benzyl-alcohol and 1-hexanol, which are common flower volatiles but also constituents of the honey bee sting gland secretions. The treatment with Thiacloprid also affected antennal responses to the QMP and the mandibular alarm pheromone 2-heptanone. In the short term, a faster signal degeneration of the response signal to the positive control citral was recorded in the antennae of bees exposed to Thiacloprid or Imidacloprid. Finally, we observed season-related differences in the antennal responses to multiple VOCs. Altogether, our results suggest that volatile-specific alterations of antennal responses may contribute to explaining several behavioral changes previously observed in neonicotinoid-exposed bees. Treatment effects were generally more prominent in the short term, suggesting that adverse effects of neonicotinoid exposure may not persist across generations.
Neonicotinoid contamination in conservation areas affects bees more sharply than beetles

Jonathan Tetlie,Alexandra Harmon-Threatt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1347526

IF: 3

2024-02-19

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:The neurotoxic insecticide class of neonicotinoids has become one of the most widely used groups of pesticides globally. Their long half-lives and high water solubility increase their potential to linger and affect numerous organisms long after application. A prominent concern associated with residual contamination is the negative impact that neonicotinoids can have on beneficial arthropods such as bees and certain groups of beetles. Many studies have looked at the effects neonicotinoids have on arthropod communities in lab settings; however, comparatively few studies have looked at these groups in neonicotinoid-contaminated restored prairie habitats. These habitats are often restored from or located near agriculture and are almost ubiquitously contaminated with neonicotinoids. Our one-year manipulated field study compared native bee nesting rates and beetle community assemblages between paired clothianidin-contaminated and non-contaminated restored prairie plots. Native bee nesting probability and nesting abundance increased by 46% and 172%, respectively, in sites contaminated with clothianidin. Conversely, we observed no significant differences in beetle family assemblages, abundance, or richness between clothianidin-contaminated and control sites. These results suggest that neonicotinoid contamination of natural habitats can have numerous environmental consequences for arthropods and that these effects are not always consistent between taxa. Understanding how neonicotinoid contamination affects beneficial groups such as bees and arthropod community assemblages is crucial for characterizing the risks these chemicals pose to ecologically imperative taxa.

ecology
Chronic exposure to neonicotinoids reduces honey bee health near corn crops

N. Tsvetkov,O. Samson-Robert,K. Sood,H. S. Patel,D. A. Malena,P. H. Gajiwala,P. Maciukiewicz,V. Fournier,A. Zayed

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam7470

IF: 56.9

2017-06-30

Science

Abstract:Damage confirmed Early studies of the impacts of neonicotinoid insecticides on insect pollinators indicated considerable harm. However, lingering criticism was that the studies did not represent field-realistic levels of the chemicals or prevailing environmental conditions. Two studies, conducted on different crops and on two continents, now substantiate that neonicotinoids diminish bee health (see the Perspective by Kerr). Tsvetkov et al. find that bees near corn crops are exposed to neonicotinoids for 3 to 4 months via nontarget pollen, resulting in decreased survival and immune responses, especially when coexposed to a commonly used agrochemical fungicide. Woodcock et al. , in a multicounty experiment on rapeseed in Europe, find that neonicotinoid exposure from several nontarget sources reduces overwintering success and colony reproduction in both honeybees and wild bees. These field results confirm that neonicotinoids negatively affect pollinator health under realistic agricultural conditions. Science , this issue p. 1395 , p. 1393 ; see also p. 1331

multidisciplinary sciences
Bees prefer foods containing neonicotinoid pesticides

Sébastien Kessler,Erin Jo Tiedeken,Kerry L Simcock,Sophie Derveau,Jessica Mitchell,Samantha Softley,Jane C Stout,Geraldine A Wright

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14414

IF: 64.8

2015-05-07

Nature

Abstract:The impact of neonicotinoid insecticides on insect pollinators is highly controversial. Sublethal concentrations alter the behaviour of social bees and reduce survival of entire colonies. However, critics argue that the reported negative effects only arise from neonicotinoid concentrations that are greater than those found in the nectar and pollen of pesticide-treated plants. Furthermore, it has been suggested that bees could choose to forage on other available flowers and hence avoid or dilute exposure. Here, using a two-choice feeding assay, we show that the honeybee, Apis mellifera, and the buff-tailed bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, do not avoid nectar-relevant concentrations of three of the most commonly used neonicotinoids, imidacloprid (IMD), thiamethoxam (TMX), and clothianidin (CLO), in food. Moreover, bees of both species prefer to eat more of sucrose solutions laced with IMD or TMX than sucrose alone. Stimulation with IMD, TMX and CLO neither elicited spiking responses from gustatory neurons in the bees' mouthparts, nor inhibited the responses of sucrose-sensitive neurons. Our data indicate that bees cannot taste neonicotinoids and are not repelled by them. Instead, bees preferred solutions containing IMD or TMX, even though the consumption of these pesticides caused them to eat less food overall. This work shows that bees cannot control their exposure to neonicotinoids in food and implies that treating flowering crops with IMD and TMX presents a sizeable hazard to foraging bees.
Single and combined exposure to ‘bee safe’ pesticides alter behaviour and offspring production in a ground-nesting solitary bee ( Xenoglossa pruinosa )

Sabrina Rondeau,Nigel E. Raine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.2939

2024-03-20

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract:Mounting evidence supporting the negative impacts of exposure to neonicotinoids on bees has prompted the registration of novel ‘bee-friendly’ insecticides for agricultural use. Flupyradifurone (FPF) is a butenolide insecticide that shares the same mode of action as neonicotinoids and has been assessed to be ‘practically non-toxic to adult honeybees' using current risk assessment procedures. However, these assessments overlook some routes of exposure specific to wild bees, such as contact with residues in soil for ground-nesters. Co-exposure with other pesticides may also lead to detrimental synergistic effects. In a fully crossed experiment, we assessed the possible lethal and sublethal effects of chronic exposure to two pesticides used on Cucurbita crops, the insecticide Sivanto Prime (FPF) and the fungicide Quadris Top (azoxystrobin and difenoconazole), alone or combined, on solitary ground-nesting squash bees ( Xenoglossa pruinosa ). Squash bees exposed to Quadris Top collected less pollen per flower visit, while Sivanto-exposed bees produced larger offspring. Pesticide co-exposure induced hyperactivity in female squash bees relative to both the control and single pesticide exposure, and reduced the number of emerging offspring per nest compared to individual pesticide treatments. This study demonstrates that ‘low-toxicity’ pesticides can adversely affect squash bees under field-realistic exposure, alone or in combination.

ecology,evolutionary biology,biology
Neonicotinoids impact bumblebee colony fitness in the field; a reanalysis of the UK’s Food & Environment Research Agency 2012 experiment

Dave Goulson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.854

IF: 3.061

2015-03-24

PeerJ

Abstract:The causes of bee declines remain hotly debated, particularly the contribution of neonicotinoid insecticides. In 2013 the UK's Food & Environment Research Agency made public a study of the impacts of exposure of bumblebee colonies to neonicotinoids. The study concluded that there was no clear relationship between colony performance and pesticide exposure, and the study was subsequently cited by the UK government in a policy paper in support of their vote against a proposed moratorium on some uses of neonicotinoids. Here I present a simple re-analysis of this data set. It demonstrates that these data in fact do show a negative relationship between both colony growth and queen production and the levels of neonicotinoids in the food stores collected by the bees. Indeed, this is the first study describing substantial negative impacts of neonicotinoids on colony performance of any bee species with free-flying bees in a field realistic situation where pesticide exposure is provided only as part of normal farming practices. It strongly suggests that wild bumblebee colonies in farmland can be expected to be adversely affected by exposure to neonicotinoids.

multidisciplinary sciences
A neonicotinoid impairs olfactory learning in Asian honey bees (Apis cerana) exposed as larvae or as adults

Ken Tan,Weiwen Chen,Shihao Dong,Xiwen Liu,Yuchong Wang,James C. Nieh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10989

IF: 4.6

2015-06-18

Scientific Reports

Abstract:AbstractXenobiotics such as the neonicotinoid pesticide, imidacloprid, are used globally, but their effects on native bee species are poorly understood. We studied the effects of sublethal doses of imidacloprid on olfactory learning in the native honey bee species, Apis cerana, an important pollinator of agricultural and native plants throughout Asia. We provide the first evidence that imidacloprid can impair learning in A. cerana workers exposed as adults or as larvae. Adults that ingested a single imidacloprid dose as low as 0.1 ng/bee had significantly reduced olfactory learning acquisition, which was 1.6-fold higher in control bees. Longer-term learning (1-17 h after the last learning trial) was also impaired. Bees exposed as larvae to a total dose of 0.24 ng/bee did not have reduced survival to adulthood. However, these larval-treated bees had significantly impaired olfactory learning when tested as adults: control bees exhibited up to 4.8-fold better short-term learning acquisition, though longer-term learning was not affected. Thus, sublethal cognitive deficits elicited by neonicotinoids on a broad range of native bee species deserve further study.

multidisciplinary sciences
Transient exposure to low levels of insecticide affects metabolic networks of honeybee larvae

Kamila Derecka,Martin J Blythe,Sunir Malla,Diane P Genereux,Alessandro Guffanti,Paolo Pavan,Anna Moles,Charles Snart,Thomas Ryder,Catharine A Ortori,David A Barrett,Eugene Schuster,Reinhard Stöger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068191

IF: 3.7

2013-07-02

PLoS ONE

Abstract:The survival of a species depends on its capacity to adjust to changing environmental conditions, and new stressors. Such new, anthropogenic stressors include the neonicotinoid class of crop-protecting agents, which have been implicated in the population declines of pollinating insects, including honeybees (Apis mellifera). The low-dose effects of these compounds on larval development and physiological responses have remained largely unknown. Over a period of 15 days, we provided syrup tainted with low levels (2 µg/L(-1)) of the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid to beehives located in the field. We measured transcript levels by RNA sequencing and established lipid profiles using liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry from worker-bee larvae of imidacloprid-exposed (IE) and unexposed, control (C) hives. Within a catalogue of 300 differentially expressed transcripts in larvae from IE hives, we detect significant enrichment of genes functioning in lipid-carbohydrate-mitochondrial metabolic networks. Myc-involved transcriptional response to exposure of this neonicotinoid is indicated by overrepresentation of E-box elements in the promoter regions of genes with altered expression. RNA levels for a cluster of genes encoding detoxifying P450 enzymes are elevated, with coordinated downregulation of genes in glycolytic and sugar-metabolising pathways. Expression of the environmentally responsive Hsp90 gene is also reduced, suggesting diminished buffering and stability of the developmental program. The multifaceted, physiological response described here may be of importance to our general understanding of pollinator health. Muscles, for instance, work at high glycolytic rates and flight performance could be impacted should low levels of this evolutionarily novel stressor likewise induce downregulation of energy metabolising genes in adult pollinators.
Sublethal doses of imidacloprid disrupt sexual communication and host finding in a parasitoid wasp

Lars Tappert,Tamara Pokorny,John Hofferberth,Joachim Ruther

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42756

IF: 4.6

2017-02-15

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Neonicotinoids are widely used insecticides, but their use is subject of debate because of their detrimental effects on pollinators. Little is known about the effect of neonicotinoids on other beneficial insects such as parasitoid wasps, which serve as natural enemies and are crucial for ecosystem functioning. Here we show that sublethal doses of the neonicotinoid imidacloprid impair sexual communication and host finding in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Depending on the dose, treated females were less responsive to the male sex pheromone or unable to use it as a cue at all. Courtship behaviour of treated couples was also impeded resulting in a reduction of mating rates by up to 80%. Moreover, treated females were no longer able to locate hosts by using olfactory cues. Olfaction is crucial for the reproductive success of parasitoid wasps. Hence, sublethal doses of neonicotinoids might compromise the function of parasitoid wasps as natural enemies with potentially dire consequences for ecosystem services.

multidisciplinary sciences
Impacts of Neonicotinoids on the Bumble Bees Bombus terrestris and Bombus impatiens Examined through the Lens of an Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework

Allison A. Camp,David M. Lehmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4939

2021-01-21

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract:Bumble bees (Bombus sp) are important pollinators for agricultural systems and natural landscapes and have faced population declines globally in recent decades. Neonicotinoid pesticides have been implicated as one of the reasons for the population reductions in bumble bees and other pollinators due to their widespread use, specificity to the invertebrate nervous system, and toxicity to bees. Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) are used to describe the mechanism of action of a toxicant through sequential levels of biological organization to understand the key events that occur for a given adverse outcome. Here, we used the AOP framework to organize and present the current literature available for the impacts of neonicotinoids on bumble bees. This review focuses on Bombus terrestris and B. impatiens, the two most commonly studied bumble bees due to their commercial availability. The present review does not seek to describe an AOP for the molecular initiating event shared by neonicotinoids, but rather aims to summarize the present literature and highlight data gaps for the Bombus research community to address. Overall, we highlight a great need for additional studies, especially those examining cellular responses and organ responses in bumble bees exposed to neonicotinoids.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

environmental sciences,toxicology
Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees

Maj Rundlöf,Georg K. S. Andersson,Riccardo Bommarco,Ingemar Fries,Veronica Hederström,Lina Herbertsson,Ove Jonsson,Björn K. Klatt,Thorsten R. Pedersen,Johanna Yourstone,Henrik G. Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14420

IF: 64.8

2015-04-22

Nature

Abstract:Neonicotinoid seed coating is associated with reduced density of wild bees, as well as reduced nesting of solitary bees and reduced colony growth and reproduction of bumblebees, but appears not to affect honeybees.

multidisciplinary sciences
Imidacloprid Alters Foraging and Decreases Bee Avoidance of Predators

Ken Tan,Weiwen Chen,Shihao Dong,Xiwen Liu,Yuchong Wang,James C. Nieh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102725

IF: 3.7

2014-07-15

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Concern is growing over the effects of neonicotinoid pesticides, which can impair honey bee cognition. We provide the first demonstration that sublethal concentrations of imidacloprid can harm honey bee decision-making about danger by significantly increasing the probability of a bee visiting a dangerous food source. Apis cerana is a native bee that is an important pollinator of agricultural crops and native plants in Asia. When foraging on nectar containing 40 µg/L (34 ppb) imidacloprid, honey bees (Apis cerana) showed no aversion to a feeder with a hornet predator, and 1.8 fold more bees chose the dangerous feeder as compared to control bees. Control bees exhibited significant predator avoidance. We also give the first evidence that foraging by A. cerana workers can be inhibited by sublethal concentrations of the pesticide, imidacloprid, which is widely used in Asia. Compared to bees collecting uncontaminated nectar, 23% fewer foragers returned to collect the nectar with 40 µg/L imidacloprid. Bees that did return respectively collected 46% and 63% less nectar containing 20 µg/L and 40 µg/L imidacloprid. These results suggest that the effects of neonicotinoids on honey bee decision-making and other advanced cognitive functions should be explored. Moreover, research should extend beyond the classic model, the European honey bee (A. mellifera), to other important bee species.

multidisciplinary sciences
Negative Effects of the Neonicotinoid Clothianidin on Foraging Behavior and Antennal Sensitivity in Two Common Pollinator Species, Osmia bicornis and Bombus terrestris

Florian Straub,Ihotu Joy Orih,Judith Kimmich,Manfred Ayasse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.697355

IF: 3

2021-09-03

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:Insect species richness and abundance has declined rapidly over the last few decades. Various stressors, such as the conversion of natural habitats, climate change, land-use intensification, agrochemicals and pathogens, are thought to be major factors in this decline. We treated female bees of two common pollinator species in Europe, Osmia bicornis and Bombus terrestris , with a field-realistic dose of the neonicotinoid clothianidin. We tested its effects on the foraging behavior of O. bicornis under semi-natural conditions and on the antennal sensitivity of both bee species to common floral volatiles by using electroantennography. Clothianidin negatively affected the foraging behavior in O. bicornis by decreasing the number of flowers visited per foraging flight and by increasing the time per flower visit and the searching time between two flowers. It also decreased the antennal sensitivity to 2-phenylethanol in the two bee species. Thus, clothianidin is clearly a threat for bees via its effects on their foraging behavior and antennal sensitivity and is hence probably detrimental for pollination and the reproductive success of bees.

ecology
The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013

Thomas James Wood,Dave Goulson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9240-x

IF: 5.8

2017-06-07

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract:Neonicotinoid pesticides were first introduced in the mid-1990s, and since then, their use has grown rapidly. They are now the most widely used class of insecticides in the world, with the majority of applications coming from seed dressings. Neonicotinoids are water-soluble, and so can be taken up by a developing plant and can be found inside vascular tissues and foliage, providing protection against herbivorous insects. However, only approximately 5% of the neonicotinoid active ingredient is taken up by crop plants and most instead disperses into the wider environment. Since the mid-2000s, several studies raised concerns that neonicotinoids may be having a negative effect on non-target organisms, in particular on honeybees and bumblebees. In response to these studies, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was commissioned to produce risk assessments for the use of clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam and their impact on bees. These risk assessments concluded that the use of these compounds on certain flowering crops poses a high risk to bees. On the basis of these findings, the European Union adopted a partial ban on these substances in May 2013. The purpose of the present paper is to collate and summarise scientific evidence published since 2013 that investigates the impact of neonicotinoids on non-target organisms. Whilst much of the recent work has focused on the impact of neonicotinoids on bees, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that persistent, low levels of neonicotinoids can have negative impacts on a wide range of free-living organisms.

environmental sciences
Neonicotinoids Impact All Aspects of Bird Life: A Meta‐Analysis

Elke Molenaar,Wolfgang Viechtbauer,Janske van de Crommenacker,Sjouke A. Kingma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14534

IF: 11.274

2024-10-10

Ecology Letters

Abstract:Neonicotinoid insecticides have unintendedly spread across a wide variety of environments. Here, we show, using a meta‐analytical approach, that exposure to neonicotinoids leads to consistent negative effects on bird health, behaviour, reproduction and survival. Widespread neonicotinoid exposure is therefore a great concern to non‐target organisms and may have far‐reaching consequences for biodiversity. Worldwide, bird populations are declining dramatically. This is especially the case in intensely used agricultural areas where the application of neonicotinoid insecticides is thought to—unintendedly—cause a cascade of negative impacts throughout food webs. Additionally, there could be direct (sub‐) lethal impacts of neonicotinoids on birds, but to date there is no comprehensive quantitative assessment to confirm or rule out this possibility. Therefore, we use a meta‐analytical approach synthesising 1612 effect sizes from 49 studies and show that neonicotinoids consistently harm bird health, behaviour, reproduction, and survival. Thus, in addition to reduced food availability, the negative direct effects of exposure to neonicotinoids likely contribute to bird population declines globally. Our outcomes are pivotal to consider in future risk assessments and pesticide policy: despite localised bans, the metabolites and residues of neonicotinoids remain present in the environment and in birds and will thus have long‐lasting direct effects on both the individual and the population levels.

ecology

Pesticide affects social behavior of bees

Pesticides and pollinator brain: How do neonicotinoids affect the central nervous system of bees?

Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees

Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment

A neonicotinoid pesticide causes tissue-specific gene expression changes in bumble bees

Neonicotinoids disrupt circadian rhythms and sleep in honey bees

Impact of Chronic Exposure to Two Neonicotinoids on Honey Bee Antennal Responses to Flower Volatiles and Pheromonal Compounds

Neonicotinoid contamination in conservation areas affects bees more sharply than beetles

Chronic exposure to neonicotinoids reduces honey bee health near corn crops

Bees prefer foods containing neonicotinoid pesticides

Single and combined exposure to ‘bee safe’ pesticides alter behaviour and offspring production in a ground-nesting solitary bee ( Xenoglossa pruinosa )

Neonicotinoids impact bumblebee colony fitness in the field; a reanalysis of the UK’s Food & Environment Research Agency 2012 experiment

A neonicotinoid impairs olfactory learning in Asian honey bees (Apis cerana) exposed as larvae or as adults

Transient exposure to low levels of insecticide affects metabolic networks of honeybee larvae

Sublethal doses of imidacloprid disrupt sexual communication and host finding in a parasitoid wasp

Impacts of Neonicotinoids on the Bumble Bees Bombus terrestris and Bombus impatiens Examined through the Lens of an Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework

Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees

Imidacloprid Alters Foraging and Decreases Bee Avoidance of Predators

Negative Effects of the Neonicotinoid Clothianidin on Foraging Behavior and Antennal Sensitivity in Two Common Pollinator Species, Osmia bicornis and Bombus terrestris

The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013

Neonicotinoids Impact All Aspects of Bird Life: A Meta‐Analysis